2. analog
  3. 1270344817

TT to another room, no vibs, better sounds?


Hi All,

A few years ago I thought I'd build a Turntable that is still about a year from being finished. The thought was mass is where it's at. If it's heavy it will take more energy to get it excited and vibrate.

After I picked up a few thousands dollars in parts my machinist asked me what I was trying to accomplish. My response was," The heavier it was the less it would vibrate."

He said, " Take it out of the vibrational environment and save money." I can do that soon and wonder if anyone else had the same thought and realized a cost effective improvement instead of spending more money on a better TT.

"Out of the mouthes of babes," Your thoughts,

ken
kftool

Showing 3 responses by kftool

kftool OP
104 posts
 
Dougdeacon,

When I decided to build a Frankentable, still not assembled, it was going to be in my music room which is also inhabited by my subs. Minus K solved my problem and built a platform that would support the 750 lb table; that was 2 years ago.

Since that time The Tape Project and more vinyl turned my room into a used record store. An addition to my music room will hold all the goodies I now have boxed up and stored in my wood shop. I cut two doorways through the 12 inch solid concrete wall that separates the two rooms. The door closest to my listening chair is 16 feet away from where the tt will be in the next room. The floors in both rooms are 8 inch thick concrete and I'm looking forward to getting it all put together.

Now that my table will be in a separate room, I think I could've cut down a bit on the weight and put it on a diet.

Ken
kftool OP
104 posts
 
Gerrym5,

Too many cables will always be a problem until you just realize that a Bose wave system will solve all your problems!!!!.

Moving gear to another room is a problem unless your system uses balanced interconnects or you have a big bank account. I realize that not many manufacturers offer gear with balanced ins and outs, and the gear that does is usually more pricey; that limits it's availability to many.

Here on Audiogon, and other forums, there are those that justify the cost and sonic benefits of mega buck single ended audio cables. To each his own.

FWIW, 95% my gear is connected with Belden- Quad Star - Mogami cable and Neutrik connectors. The few single ended cables I do use are quality cables, shorter than a few feet, and carry signals that sound fine to my ears.

As you said," learn and pick what works for you."

Ken
kftool OP
104 posts
 
Gerrym5

I mentioned the Belden cables because---.

I don't believe in single ended terminations, in or out unless they're is no other
choice. SE cables are fine if they're short!

SE cables are inherently more prone to noise and interference. Balanced cables shield both leads and the Mogami design incorporates three shields.

SE cables are OVERPRICED!

Balanced cables give you a 6db boost in level over SE cables, a plus.

Hardees Chicken biscuits are great if you have them butter both sides of the biscuit.
JUST CHECKING TO SEE IF YOU'RE PAYING ATTENTION!!

The studios that record the music we listen to didn't use cables that cost $1,000 per meter. The GREAT recordings we revere from the golden years of audio were recorded on the same high end cable that my Altec M11 mikes used $.20 per ft in 1956.

Eight years ago I bought 1,400 feet of the best Belden Quad star Mogami cable they made at $1,60 per ft. It was the cable that was most used in studios and sound stages world wide and not because it was cheap; it was the most expensive cable Belden made except for that which was re wrapped with with special color covers for secondary sellers, AKA the cable barons.

Enough said about my personal preferences as I've probably made a few enemies that sell the, IMHO, high priced SE cables, but maybe it just my 68 years old ears!

Ken


,






More to discover