Tossed between the horns Maggie 3A/PSB Gold I


I have been a long time Maggie fanboy, having bought my first pair back in 1982. For the past 12 years I have been using a pair of MG 3A's with a pair of M&K subs. I have continued to keep these in great operational shape and over the past winter I upgrade the caps in the cross-overs, replaced the tired ribbons, rewired the speakers with silver/cooper/teflon wire and remoloxied the diaphragms. I also put new socks on them. Needless to say they sound and look great. I also have Sound Anchor stands; so for all intents and purposes, these speakers have been taken almost as far as they can go.

Recently, I have taken in a pair of PSB Gold I. Generally, I get a second pair of speakers to listen to and play with from time to time. After a short period of time I usually sell off the second pair because they do not provide me with the same sonic enjoyment as the Maggies. However, the PSB are proving to be a bit of a different story.

They are a bit more upfront sounding and have great dynamics at low/medium to low volumes. They throw a good sound stage and when bi-amped and used with subs they have a well defined and deep low end.

My Maggies, on the other hand, have a better high end. The ribbon tweeter can't be bested, in this regard. They also have a more organic sound and throw a larger sound stage. However, you do have to be sitting in the sweet spot to enjoy it. Off axis and everything collapses. The mids are more laid back, which is great for some recordings.

So, that is the good and the not so good about each speaker. I can keep both but would eventually need to sell off one due to limited room and it makes a mess of my listening space.

After another week or so I'm going to throw the Maggies back into use and make my choice, however, I know it is not going to be an easy one.

Ultimately, I am going to use my ears, as I always do, to decide but my question to you, the reader is, "which would you choose?" Please no responses that include it is up to me and let my ears decide. Of course, this is what I am going to do. I want to entertain your thoughts specific to these two choices.

Thanks!!!!
raymonda

Showing 2 responses by bdp24

I neglected to say that I find music reproduced via the two basic loudspeaker designs (planars and boxes, or line-source and point-source) to be two very different experiences. That, I understand, is not universal.
Loudspeakers are the most personal of all the links in the Hi-Fi chain, and change the sound of music in the most profound way, IMO. My first great speaker was the original Tympani I-U (I've never learned what the U designated, other than to differentiate it from the VERY original T-I), but was seduced away from it by the Fulton J, a loudspeaker with more and better bass (a cone in a transmission line-loaded enclosure) and the State-of-the-Art RTR ESL-6 tweeter, with the legendary Fulton Model 80 between them. It didn't take long for me to regret the substitution. Yes, taken section by section, the Fulton J bested the I-U, but those qualities proved to be less important to me than what the Tympani did that the Fulton didn't. Essentially nothing has changed in the following 40-45 years; either what large line-source loudspeakers do that point-source loudspeakers don't is of paramount importance to you in the reproduction of music, or it isn't.