Circa 1988 I held an issue of Sterophile in my extra-large mittens for the first time. I have subscribed from that day till now. In the beginning I was particularly impressed with the thoughts and words of one J. Gordon Holt (1930- 2009). If I recall correctly J. Gordon was positively death on the idea of blind testing. Many of J. Gordon’s thought soon became mine also. But now after considering the ideas of Amir, via his website and U Tube channel, both called Audio Science Review, I have reconsidered my position. Amir’s logic seems irrefutable.
Fred has a significant Hifi. While in Ace Hardware he spots a power cable that seems identical to the one that is attached to his Mark Levinson amp. Fred reasons that that power cord is limiting his whole system. He unleashes a well-planned research effort and fixates on a cable that sells for 900 sovereigns. A local brick and mortar guy offers him a 2 week return policy, and “poof” it’s home and hocked up. Fred lets the cable “cook” for 48 hours and then begins “the test.” He warms up everything, and them dawns a sleep mask. A loved one, or friend plays a piece of music, of Fred’s choosing, 10 times randomly switching the cables such that each cable is played a total of 5 times. After each playing the assistant takes note of which cable was used and what Fred’s reaction was. If Fred discerns correctly 8 or 9 times and clearly prefers the new cable, it is established that the new cable has proven itself and is well worth the price. But if Fred is able to discern the difference between the cables correctly only 5 times, that is meaningless, because he could have done that by guessing. If Fred wants to increase his confidence in his decision, he could repeat the process, with a different piece of music in few days later.
So, using your ears, in your listing space, with your system, and playing your music, you are unable to document an improvement in perceived sound quality, created by a new gizmo, why would you want it?
That’s what I think, what do you think?
