Thiel CS 3.6 vs 3.7


Replacing my model 3.6 speakers has come with a great deal of hesitation. I purchased them used from a dealer in 1993 after owning the model 2 2s. I have recently acquired a pair of 3.7s that are shipping as I write this. I understand that "beauty is in the ear of the beholder", but has anyone had both and had a preference? I ask because I do think collective wisdom is important and I do not want to be in the position of letting the "newer and improved" mentality creep into my judgment. What differences could I expect to hear? Context is Hegel Mohican to Audio Research Ref 3 to McCormack (SMc Audio) DNA 1 with almost all mods including Plitron transformer. Balanced throughout with AQ Columbia XLR and Kimber Monocle XL speaker cable. AQ Niagra 1000 conditioner and Shunyata Alpha HC power cables. Thanks in advance.
yabe1951

Showing 3 responses by jafant

yabe1951

 

Are you enjoying retirement? Thank You for the Rotel vs. Hegel comparison. In 20 years, no doubt, that the technology changed. The 991 is a solid Vintage player. The Mohican is a solid modern player.

Did you upgrade the McCormack Amp?

 

Happy Listening!

yabe1951

it is Amazing what a good CD player can do regarding playback.

Happy Listening!
yabe1951

Nice score! on the CS 3.7 loudspeakers. Your gear is a sonic match for this model. I am especially interested in reading more about the system featuring Hegel Mohican cd player. 
Once the CS 3.7 settles into your room/system, feel free to join us over on Thiel Owners thread. We have several 3.7 fans/owners on the Panel.

Happy Listening!