the differences between sacd players


it is my hypothesis that the variation in the "sound" of sacd players is considerably less than that of redbook cd players.

i believe this to be the case since hybrid sacds, which are not remastered from pcm, but are instead original recordings, is of such a high quality, that differences in playback are not as great as what would be experienced when listening to redbook cds.

has anyone compared several sacd players and can comment on this ?

if i am correct, it doesn't make much sense to spend a lot of money on an sacd player to play sacd discs.

i may be looking for an sacd player as i have about 150 sacd discs. while i would invest over $4000 on a cd player, i don't think it is necessary to spend the same for an sacd player. in fact music direct has a sale on a marantz sa 15, for $1399. it may be sufficient.
mrtennis

Showing 1 response by ramy

Different SACD players do result in different sound.I do agree with Ckoffend that Multi channel SACD can sound unnatural and very artificial.I do listen to a 5 channel system but through a Meridian 861 which does distribute the sound properly.
I have listened to a number of SACD players in my system.My experience indicate that unless the recording is very good and the sacd player is superior ,the hybrid reproduction on a high quality red book player can sound as good or even better,(I listen to primarily classical music) Example,listening to many sacd on EMM SE combo was inferior to the hybrid reproduction on a Reimyo777 or The Zanden combo.However,for two channel SACD I find the Accuphase 800/801,very good and superior to the hybrid.For multi channel I usually listen using the esoteric X-01,but only when the recording was well recorded.In my bedroom system I use the CARY sacd it is very very good ,a 2-channel player,and is more reasonably priced.I would stay away from MF.EMM.Depending on the rest of your system and the kind of music you listen to the XA-ES sony or marantz may be adequate.