The Back Street Boys of Classical??


I have recently started piano lessons and theory with a wonderful teacher who is remarkably intelligent and has decades of experience playing and composing. When asking me about my taste in music, I think I mentioned Stravinsky, amoung others, from a basket of jazz, pop and classical music that I have enjoyed. I guess I need to be humbled as a student as I was a little embarrassed when he used the expression "salon composer", which I took to mean popular with the bourgeois but not taken seriously by musicians. An additional faux pas of mine was thinking that Vince Guaraldi should be found in the "jazz" section of Tower Records. Could someone educate my a bit more about classical (In the Tower Records, not historical sense of the word) composers? Who would be considered the N Synch of their time? And which composers have really endured as as worthy and challenging for people who really understand music? I realize this is somewhat subjective but hopefully will inspire lively debate.
cwlondon

Showing 1 response by adamanteus

Cwlondon-

The other respondents are right. Your teacher may be a superb technician and theorist, but he(?) is a card-carrying snob. Stravinsky a "salon composer"? Good grief! Though he doesn't always fire my muse, Stravinsky was a composer of considerable rank and substance. Your teacher should shut up, teach you scales, harmony, theory, contrapuntal devices ( if you want to go that far ) and keep his opinions to himself. YOU be the judge of what you like, and screw "informed" opinion. Sorry, but that kind of stuff really torques me.

Someone else here wrote of a person who thought Mozart a lightweight. That almost defies a sensible reply! Most scholars I've read think him to be the greatest composer who ever lived. And he was no mean musician, either. He's certainly in my pantheon of composers along with Bruckner, Sibelius, Mahler, Schubert.

Maybe you should dump this teacher and find one who wants to teach, not pontificate.