6 responses Add your response
Sorry, George, my Music Server and DAC only do DSD via DoP, but I can hear differences in the DXD vs the PCM 192 wav vs the Flac 352 files. The native DXD file sounds cleaner and blacker with more detail and better image specificity.
If you decide to buy some of these full downloads (good music and very good to excellent sound), keep in mind that all but two jazz titles ("Sings the Blues" (DXD) and "Impromptu" (DSD64)) are native PCM 24/96 and the DSD upsampling/conversion does the sound no favors on these IMO.
I would be curious to read what you (or others) think. You can get the iFi sampler for free using code "ifimicroidac2" in the coupon field on the purchase screen. "A Thousand Shades of Blue" has non-native DSD64 and non-native 96/24 FLAC files (??) to compare and Impromptu has native DSD64 and native 24/96 FLAC files to compare. The differences in level (loudness) between the two "Blue" files makes it challenging to compare, but the true native vs native comparison of Impromptu shows the native DSD to be audibly superior to the native 24/96 FLAC to by ears.
Correction to last sentence re: "Impromptu": The native DSD64 file has a blacker background, more detail, with the acoustic bass focused on the neck and the piano "smoother" dynamically & slightly bashful harmonically while the native 192/24 FLAC file portrays the acoustic bass as rounder, with more body, and the piano as more percussive, with more decay. Put a different way, the DSD64 is the "Black Tuxedo" version and the 192/24 FLAC more sportcoat, jeans, and shades.
A matter of preference but neither is subject to being kicked out of bed for eating crackers.