Technics SL-1700 feet

Good to hear, Thank you for sharing your feedback! 

I agree with chakster reg. ''standard Technics footers'': worthless.
I substituted those with AT 636 footers under my Obsidian plinth
and SP 10,mk2 . I assume that chakster' s are bigger but not
necessary  better. Anyway both are excellent. 
.

I just ordered some of those MNPCTECH feet as well. They are the aluminum model with the tapered top and made for a Technics SL-1200. I'm putting them on my Yamaha PX-3 that I'm restoring. I already rebuilt the tonearm assembly and now I'm waiting for my tech to recap the power supply and control boards.
Should be a sweet table when I'm finished with it.

BillWojo

@nandric

I substituted those with AT 636 footers under my Obsidian plinth
and SP 10,mk2 . I assume that chakster’ s are bigger but not
necessary better.

Now when i have the manual for both models i can tell you they are completely different internally as i can see on schematic. So the difference is definitely NOT only the size. The bigger AT-616 (support up to 60kg) has different structure compared to smaller AT-636 (support up to 36kg). Not just bigger spring but entirely different design of pneumatic mechanism inside. 

Well my MNPCTECH feet came in today and they are very well constructed, the machining is first class and the rubber is nice and pliable. Once I get the table back together I'm sure they will work fine and it will look even better as well.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/TECHNICS-SL1200-1210-mk2-mk3-mk4-mk5-DJ-Turntable-DOME-Style-FOUR-FEET/3032...
BillWojo