Synergestic Black Fuse vs Audio Magic BeesWax


Like to ask if any Audiogon Members compared the Synergistic Black Fuse Vs The Audio Magic BeesWax ( top of line). Let me know what differences in sound quality, what equipment was it in, and how does it compare between the two fuse.   Current all my equipment has The Black fuses; I am just curious WTF Audio Magic is So Expensive!  Is it worth a big jump with the Audio Magic?? 
Ca6bdf8a 14b4 4e97 84e2 fecb0f8ce879zipost
elizabeth
90.000. Where did THAT number pop up from? 🥧 🥧 🥧
If you are claiming of 90,000 fuses in use in audio equipment, at least 4,500 have had aftermarket fuses tried.. Maybe.. maybe...

>>>>>What on earth are you going on about? This was all covered many times. Try to pay attention.
Hey, zipost. How come no peep at all from you since Ted Denney gave you that classy on his part beat down? No rebuttal? No defense? So I take it everything he posted is true. Man, that is some no integrity, classless behavior. Shameful.
Cleedus,

It's ALWAYS on those who make an affirmative claim to prove the claim with a plausible theory and valid evidence. Sans a plausible theory and valid evidence, the claim is rightly written off as nonsense. 

@elizabeth 

Geoff is making a Texas sharp shooter fallacy. He's claiming that because 90,000 boutique fuses have been sold to happy customers, they must do something, while deliberately ignoring the billions of fuses billions of people use every day quite happily as well. His argument could just as easily be flipped to say "Because billions of common fuses have been sold with overwhelming customer satisfaction, common fuses must be superior". Neither argument is necessarily logical or accurate because both presume sales volume somehow correlates to technical capabilities. It's an idiotic presumption on it's face. 
It's ALWAYS on those who make an affirmative claim to prove the claim with a plausible theory and valid evidence. Sans a plausible theory and valid evidence, the claim is rightly written off as nonsense.
An example of an Appeal to False Authority.
Geoff is making a Texas sharp shooter fallacy. He's claiming that because 90,000 boutique fuses have been sold to happy customers, they must do something, while deliberately ignoring the billions of fuses billions of people use every day quite happily as well. His argument could just as easily be flipped to say "Because billions of common fuses have been sold with overwhelming customer satisfaction, common fuses must be superior". Neither argument is necessarily logical or accurate because both presume sales volume somehow correlates to technical capabilities. It's an idiotic presumption on it's face.
An example of Base Rate Fallacy.

Unless I'm mistaken. For a better understanding, check out this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

One will recognize a lot of fallacious arguments listed that are continually used here.

All the best,
Nonoise


nonoise,
What's the name they give to the fallacious argument that says you have to prove what you hear to anyone else?