Surround Processor better than a Proceed AVP?


Looking for a $500-900 Surround Processor Recommendation to replace a Proceed AVP-S:

1.Must have multi-room (2 zone) preout for 2-ch (so no Meridian?)
2.2-ch and 5-ch music quality on-par with or better than the Proceed AVP-S (so no Japanese AVRs?)
3.DD/DTS a must
4.Reliable – no pops or hiss. I’m getting some little pops and hangs with my AVP.
5.DD TrueHD or 5.1 analog input (AVP lacks this, AVP2 too expensive?)

Amps will be Rotel, speakers from North Creek (front/sub) and NHT (rear in-ceiling). I will not need any video switching.
ericsphillips

Showing 6 responses by kennyt

First, you will not find a pre/pro that natively decodes DD TrueHD via anything BUT HDMI, so your $500-900 is out of the question without using analog inputs (5.1 or 7.1) and besting the older Proceed gear for audio is tough.

Proceed was made to 'experiment' in the Mark Levinson line without risking the ML name, so many thing made under Proceed were REALLY good for the money (IMHO the HPA 2/3 amps are still exceptional and rival the 400 series ML amps at a fraction of the cost.)

Even if you currently own an AVP, it won't bring much in resale value, so you are still likely under $2K for a pre/pro, which gives you older used (non HDMI) or the likes of the Marantz SR8003 or Integra pre/pro's.

You could get a used Classe SSP600 for about $2K which would do what you want and sound very good, different than the AVP, so you will need to see if its an improvement or not to you sonically but it would allow MC analog inputs, not sure about second zone but believe it does this too.

I don't think the older Anthems nor current Anthems will best the AVP for music, and as you said Maridian won't work for you. Older Krell's are a good choice, one you might look for is the old Audio Video Standard that come up some times for cheap and are really well made and sound quite good.

The PAV/PDSD from Proceed was a great piece but you'll need to modify the connector for MC Analog inputs and they are pretty old and many are reaching failure and they are expensive to fix so I would steer away from these, even though sonically they are better than your AVP.
db,

What you need is a processor that can decode the new codecs of Blu-ray, they are a HUGE step forward in movie soundtracks!

Unfortunately to match the sound of your PDSD/PAV you'll be spending ~$7K plus.

I feel your pain in the combo, Madrigal really screwed everyone who bought that piece, they just let that set die on the vine. Too bad it's a really good sounding piece, as it should be for the $10K it cost new (my buddy just sold his for $1,400 a few months back, several months after sending it inb for repairs that cost $1,500)
The Cary is seriously limited by it's two HDMI inputs.

While more money I prefer the Classe' SSP800 or Arcam AV888.
I have the Classe SSP800 and the Arcam AV888, sort of different animals, but both are very good sounding units.
Ballan,

I had a Linn AV5013 in a fully active Linn system with four 5140's, 5120 and the 5150 sub, sweet system for my condo, didn't handle the larger room my current system lives in in the house, but it doesn't have 5.1 analog inputs, only DD (and DTS in later model over I think after SN 3000)