depends on how you listen and what your setup is--if you have top flight equipment in a living room system, get tidal. if (like me) you wanna listen toyour mobile thru headphones on the go, spotify is the bomb.
I like the Tidal site a lot, but Spotify has always had a larger library. Therefore I have both. It will be difficult to pick a streaming service as we are entering a brave new world with digital hi-res music. Roon looks very cool, and I may change to Roon soon. Many choices.... but I do like MQA whichever service is offering it.
Agree with loomis. If you listen on hi-end audio, Tidal is IT! While I'm waiting to buy a new main system, I stream Tidal from my desktop (Tidal desktop app) in my office to KEF X300As. FANTASTIC sound.
One more Tidal thought. They desperately need to up grade their interface (at least the desktop app, which is all I've used). You need to be able to search YOUR created playlists (not just theirs), and another big problem I have is that when you use the "back" arrow to go back to your playlist, it takes you to the top (or somewhere in between), but not to where you left the playlist. VERY ANNOYING and time consuming. Bad Tidal! :-(
I had both Tidal and Spotify for about 3-4 weeks and I noticed that Tidal sounded a little smoother on remastered/old recordings and no difference with newer digital recordings. Spotify seemed easier to manage but I am sure, with time and practice, both would be same. Using Cat8 eathernet cable made dramatic improvement overall. For money, I think, Spotify does good job. (Not that $10 extra is lot but, I felt, I could use $120 per year savings to buy LPs). I don't have experience with MQA, but, I have lived through many versions of digital "improvements" that never really materialized commercially except MP3. How is that for quality digital music!
This list seems to be missing Murfie as well. They also have FLAC files available for streaming or download. It's cheaper than Tidal or Deezer and you can send CDs and LPs to be digitized so there's no limit on the available content. If you subscribe you can host your entire existing collection and get 12 album credits every year to grow your collection. Seems to me like the best value if you want FLAC but you don't want to deal with content restrictions.
As for me, I like better Spotify to listen to songs and playlists as Spotify allows me to access to the music library without cost. And I have received a Spotify Music Converter for Mac to download Spotify tracks as MP3 for playback offline on MP3 player with my free account on Spotify.
For me, Spotify and it is not close. I use streaming exclusively for music discovery and Spotify is far better at that. If I like an album sufficiently to want to listen on unbridled quality, I buy it.
I've never tried Spotify so can't say that Tidal is "better", but I chose Tidal because of the availability of Master quality albums. I do almost all my Tidal listening on decent systems and can hear noticeable differences in sound quality when comparing most of the Master quality albums vs their "HI-FI" versions even when not using a MQA capable device. I wish Tidal catered more to my musical tastes (classic rock, jazz, electronic) and was easier to browse by those categories, but I can usually find anything I want through the search function.
Somebody earlier stated the Tidal interface on the desktop was poor and I somewhat agree. I stream Tidal via my Bluesound Vault which means using the android Bluos app rather than the Tidal app. I have compared the Tidal android app to the Tidal functionality inside the Bluos app and it is no contest. Using Tidal inside the Bluos app is far superior to Tidal own app which yes is odd but there it is!
And as far as SQ, Tidal by a landslide. Some complain of the search functions and limited jazz/classical library. I have never had an issue with search and do not listen to jazz or classical so cannot comment but can state that their rock library is much larger than Deezer or Quboz right now.