I have heard the Auditor M's and the Guarneri's fill a 16' x 30' LR with great weight and extension. I agree with Milimetr that the Guarneri's are more transparent than the Auditor M's; both drivers are far superior in the Guarneri's. I have heard the Electa's in that same room, but did not do a three-way comparison. Of the three, based on what I remember hearing on two seperate auditions, I liked the Guarneri's the most.
Sonus Faber Electa Amator mk I vs Auditor M
My system consits of the following:
Digital frontend: Meridian 500,Meridian 518,meridian 566.24
Analog: Transrotor ZET I, Grado ref wood cartridge
Amplification: Spectral DMA90 & Spectral DMC20 II
Signal Cabling: MIT
Mains cabling: Furutech incl mains filter
Loudspekers: Sonus Faber Electa Amator mk I
I'm planning to upgrade my speakers to the new auditor M series.
Is there anyone who can comment what improvemenst to expect?? (if any...)
The Electa Amator is an excellend musical loudspeaker that I've enyojed for many many years but perhaps not the most subtle and transparent speaker around. Even driven by spectral.
With Auditor M I'm expecting more transparency, speed and agilty while hopefuly musical at the same time.
Any comment welcome....
Digital frontend: Meridian 500,Meridian 518,meridian 566.24
Analog: Transrotor ZET I, Grado ref wood cartridge
Amplification: Spectral DMA90 & Spectral DMC20 II
Signal Cabling: MIT
Mains cabling: Furutech incl mains filter
Loudspekers: Sonus Faber Electa Amator mk I
I'm planning to upgrade my speakers to the new auditor M series.
Is there anyone who can comment what improvemenst to expect?? (if any...)
The Electa Amator is an excellend musical loudspeaker that I've enyojed for many many years but perhaps not the most subtle and transparent speaker around. Even driven by spectral.
With Auditor M I'm expecting more transparency, speed and agilty while hopefuly musical at the same time.
Any comment welcome....