@ steakster
Still waiting, what is the name and model of this amp so we can put this to bed.
Cheers George
Still waiting, what is the name and model of this amp so we can put this to bed.
Cheers George
SE vs Balanced volume
@ steakster
Still waiting, what is the name and model of this amp so we can put this to bed. Cheers George |
What is meant by "summing stages for single-ended output" Thanks.This is usually, a proper fully balanced circuit, and then an opamp/circuit is needed to sum both +- make it SE, in this case the xrl/balanced should sound better as the SE has the extra opamp/circuit in the signal path. But in the OP’s case it seems to be the other way around, to which he still hasn’t given any model or manufacturer name so we can put this to bed. Cheers George |
@steakster What is this amp??? That you got rid of Artemis 6c33c monoblocks for, I am intrigued. http://img.usaudiomart.com/uploads/large/1369416-cr-developments-artemis-mono-blocks.jpg http://img.usaudiomart.com/uploads/large/1369418-cr-developments-artemis-mono-blocks.jpg Cheers George |
because the signal coming in on the RCA connector together with the inverse of that signal provided at the output of the INA134 enables the input board to be provided with a balanced pair of signals.That means one phase only going to the "balanced" input board is going through the INA134, as it’s clearly just a single ended output, pin 6 on the data sheet. If that's the way it’s no wonder some think the balanced sound better. This should be called fake single ended. Why sacrifice sound quality of the rca for the sake of the same gain. http://circuits.datasheetdir.com/164/INA134-pinout.jpg I can see it using the AD8476. http://www.mouser.in/images/microsites/low-power-diff-con-fig01.jpg Cheers George |
So what your saying then is the RCA input uses the IN134 to provide an extra 6db of gain to keep both inputs the same level, but there’s no feedback network to set the gain, and as the data sheet says it’s fixed gain at unity. Also then wouldn’t the switch have to have to be more than just a simple two pole switch? If not then and I’m wrong the rca is at a disadvantage having to go through the opamp. Burr Brown INA134 FEATURES ● SINGLE ● FIXED GAIN = 0dB (1V/V) AUDIO DIFFERENTIAL LINE RECEIVER ● SUMMING AMPLIFIER ● UNITY-GAIN INVERTING AMPLIFIER ● Cheers George |
As I have explained in precise detail multiple timesSorry Al, but you assume the amp itself is fully balanced, where and who said this. Can the OP state what amp make and model it is? So we can stop the assumptions. PS: I just looked at the OP's posts on his amps they use a (12ax7 as a phase splitter) still saying they're fully balanced? Because what I see is the IN134 used to make a balanced input single ended, just as I’ve seen with a certain Classe models, which is fake balanced. Cheers George |
That’s could be right also Al, didn’t look at it from that angle, just saw the shielded cable going to that point. In any case I wouldn’t like to have that single ended INA134 in the signal path on my amp/s. And as I said before if the amp was full balanced they would have used the INA2134 to get balanced output from the opamp even then, yuck!. Cheers George |
If you guys look at the shielded cable soldered connection you'll see it's one live and two connections to the ground plane making it single ended. https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AGcHA6Bqk4TpTLo&cid=31799128EF335049&id=31799128EF335049%2127368&parId=31799128EF335049%21117&o=OneUp Cheers George |
Like I said the only time balanced is an advantage is for noise rejection, but is only an advantage over rca with very long interconnects, and there is no sound advantage, if anything it’s a worse sound in this fake balanced connection case above with an opamp in the signal path, the $2 INA134 was never designed for high-end audio use, more like PA audio. Cheers George |
INA134 is a differential amp (instrumentation amp), designed for audio, that provides very high (90dB) Common Mode Noise Rejection.It’s still a faked balanced into what is obviously not balanced amp, and it’s also an unwanted opamp in the signal path, of what must be a single end input amp. In the end it’s which is going to sound better, I’ll lay money on the single ended input. Like the saying goes the best opamp is no opamp. Cheers George |
steaksterWithout the circuit, that to me looks like fake balanced with that opamp (INA134?) sitting there, if so then the single ended should sound better, unless your running 10mt interconnects, then the balanced "maybe" a touch quieter for noise but not better in sound. As you got red green and white for opamp power, and the single whitish one to the right looks like it’s the single ended shielded signal carrier to the input board. Just looked yes it is a fake balanced, that opamp is a balanced to single ended converter. http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/sbos071/sbos071.pdf Best opamp is no opamp, go the single ended input, which bypasses the opamp. Cheers George |
steakster Seeing this amp is fake balanced, I would just use the rca out of the preamp (just incase it's also fake output) into the rca in of the amp, for the best sound if your interconnects are <5mt. No advantage in using balanced out of the preamp to rca in of the amp. Cheers George |