My question is this; If the 201 is borrowing technology from the 301/302 amps, then why are the 201's so small (physically) in comparison to the 301? Or, in other words why would the 301 have to be so huge(physically) in comparison to the 201's? Logic would dictate that a pair of 201's rated at 250wpc should be pretty close in size to a single 301 rated at 300wpc, but the pair of 201's seen to take up less than half the real estate as a single 301.
Rowland 201 mono's, has anyone heard them?
I was in a Rowland dealer and they showed me the new Rowland 201 mono blocks for $4700.00 per pair. These were not yet broken in & I did not really listen. 250 watts per channel @ $4,700.00 per pair. At $4,700.00 per pair has anyone listen to these beauties?