REL Storm III or Strata III


I've read great reviews for both subs. I'm looking for the best complement for my main speakers (Thiel 22's) and listening room (15x16x7). I'm runniing plenty of power to my Thiels (400wpc) and they sound great. I am planning to add a sub primarily because of a recent addition to Home Theater but also want the best audio for my two channel. I'm leaning to the Strata III because of what I've read, they have a slightly tighter sound with no ill effects of a ported design to that of the Storm III. Also if I come to the conclusion that the Strata cannot kept up with my Thiels, I could always mortgage my home and get a second Strata. I really don't want to go that route if the Storm is all that I will ever need. Anyone who as owned or heard both in the same listening room, please give me some feedback. Thanks
islandflyfisher

Showing 2 responses by sugarbrie

They are both nice subs. I would ignore the comments about the ported design. I believe it is more a problem with the operator not knowing how to setup an integrate the sub. The ported design enables the Storm to go deeper than the Stratus. Do not assume that the persons posting reviews on places like Audioreview and the like know what they are doing. Most of the subs higher up the ladder than the Storm are also ported. Someone made the same comments about port noise in the Stadium. If you want two subs, one better one is usually better than two cheaper ones. Especially since you can always add the second one later when your budget allows.

The way to tighten up the bass in the Storm if you feel it is needed is to replace the stock power cord with something better (2 meter cord). Happy listening.

Correct, and the Storm II was 100 watts; the Storm III is 150 watts. Go to www.hifichoice.co.uk and read their reviews on both the Storm III and Stratus III. They are a mid-fi and budget audiophile magazine. The rated the Storm III their favorite of all subwoofers in the price ranges they review.