Records weights or pucks -heavy or light?


There is quite a variety of record weights or pucks on the market now, with a huge range of weight, from as little as 160g up to 1200g and more. I'm not confused about the wisdom of using a clamp or weight. I AM confused as to how to choose a good weight for my turntable, a Pro-ject Xperience belt drive. I already have a screw clamp, but a slip-on weighted puck is much easier and quicker to use.

Leaving aside the issue of sprung tables, where heavy pucks can be problematic due to the suspension, does anyone have wisdom re light weight pucks versus heavyweight pucks, puck material and the resonance damping of the record?
echigosanya

Showing 1 response by echigosanya

Thanks for the input. I checked with Sumiko and they said that using the Pro-ject Puck should not pose any problems, either with the motor or the bearing. Interesting since the puck is almost a 50% increase in the weight of the platter.

I've done some experimenting: I set up a mock weight on the turntable of about the same weight as the Pro-ject Puck and noticed no slow start or belt slippage. I compared the sound of this arrangement to the lightweight Pro-ject screw clamp, and also to nothing on the spindle at all. The screw clamp gave the overall best result in terms of clarity, bass and imaging. A bare spindle gave the weakest results and the mock weight of about 850g was a strong improvement over the bare spindle but lost out to the clamp.
I thought I might get some improvement of speed stability with the 850g weight(a 42% increase in platter mass), but that wasn't the case.

So now, I'm curious about lighter puck weights, in the region of 200-400g. I'll investigate further.