Question for Dunlavy ScIII users

Like Spudco said, the Dunlavy's are easy to drive. I had a pair of SC-III's for a short time, but returned them for the SC-IV's for more bass. I drove both with a Krell KSA-50S, 50 watts into 8 ohms, but the Krell is a powerful amp. The Dunlavy's would literally slap you in the chest when Enya hit a kettle drum in "The Long Ships" with those 50 watts. Get a powerful amp, an amp that takes over the speakers and makes them do what it wants them to do. The old Adcom GFA-555 didn't do them justice, even when bridged to mono. I've recently traded my Krell pre-amp and amp for a Musical Fidelity A308cr pre-amp and amp, and I'm smiling and have never regretted the switch. Audition them if you can.

I'm glad Piezo brought up tubes. I bought a pair of B&W Silver Signatures ($8000.00) to use in my main system when I moved it into the basement because they were stand mounted monitors. They didn't have the bass of the Dunlavy's of course, so I tried to insert the Dunlavy's back in, but I couldn't keep them there. The B&W's were so sweet in the midrange that it sounded like the singer was in the room with me. As good as the Dunlavy's sounded, they didn't do that. I used the Krell KSA-50S with both, so I can't blame it all on the 50 watt Krell. But tubes are sweet through the mids, and with enough power in reserve, it may very well the better way to go. Besides ARC and VTL, try giving the Conrad-Johnson Premier 140 a listen.

Mike, you asked about the room. My room in the basement is 16' x 23' with a 7' ceiling. I've had the system on both the long and short wall. The short wall worked better because I have the speakers 4'-5' out into the room, and along the short wall allowed me to sit 8'-10' away. The long wall create a near field monitoring situation that doesn't really even work with the B&W's since I like rock at realistic (emotional) levels.