Quatre dg-250 amplifier

Hi All,

I recently acquired the above amplifier and have found very limited info on it on the web. I have not hooked it up as of yet. I wanted to have it looked over first. Any suggestions on where to take it? I'm in S. Riverside County (Temecula) and work in San Diego County.

Just wondering if anyone has any info on them. I understand the first models were unstable and were suceptible to "blowing up" (not too sure about that) If anyone can enlighten me, it would be greatly appreciated.

You want to talk with Chris Donnelly of Sundisk Studios in Flagstaff AZ. He knows about these amps - and yes, some of them did "blow up". I have the Quatre preamp, which is very good.
Thanks Peter! You wouldn't happen to have any contact info would you? Didn't find much on the web...
The early gain cells were best with 8 ohm speakers in terms of stability. If one blows up you may have hard time sourcing transistors. Check this link:

I had a Quatre Gain Cell amp. In the early 80's I thought this amp was very special. I gave it away to someone who thought he could fix it. Probably still trying to figure it out. Tom

These are very rare, and very special amps.

I first heard one circa 1980 when I was just getting into this hobby.

As I was in junior high school, the system was impossibly expensive and exotic - an Apt Holman preamp, Quatre Gain cell, Dahlquist speakers and a Thorens turntable with an Infinity black widow arm.

I searched forever to find one in mint condition for my collection, but havent really used it.

For future reference, it would be great to know who can service and/or upgrade them.
I purchased one in 1978 and had it upgraded to the QMI 300 when Quatre was purchased by them in 1980 IIRC. I ran it with Maggie II A & B's. It never blew up on me but I did hear the horror stories about it. Also, when it gave itself up to the audio ghost it liked to take the attached speakers with it. The problem has something to do with passing a 60 hz burst. They were limited to early manufactured units ann was fixed when the issue reared it's ugly head. One of the audio magazines gave it high praise and then retracked it when this issue first surfaced. It caused the company to decline and eventually to get purchased.

In 1992, I gave it away to my previous neighbor's son who was just getting interested in high end audio. Along with the QMI, I gifted him an Audionics BT2 preamp because the two seemed to have great synergy. Recently I visited with him and it was still in operation, but there was some noticeable mechanical hum coming from the transformer. It didn't pass through to the speakers and still sounded pretty good. Gain cell amps are one of those interesting designs. I will pass the repair person's name on to him so he can have it brought back to spec if it's cost effective.

Thanks all for your input. Being referred to Chris Donnelly at Sundisk Studios, he said there was another version (the 250c), but I wouldn't know it without looking at the circuit board. I'm going to take it to my local audio shop to have it checked out. Hopefully I'll have something good!

-LngBruno, did you say you knew of a repair person?

Thanks again!
I have owned 4 gain cells over the years.

The GC 300 was the best sounding model and the best capable of driving speakers with difficult impedance properties. The next best was the DG250C. Quatre/QMI licensed the 250/300 designs and produced variations and made changes the designer did not sanction. In particular, the 500 I heard sounded terrible and these were prone to blow up.

Mechanical hum may be caused by the transformer mounts - grommets broke or bolts loosened up.

Some 300s were retrofitted into 250 chassis. These are more desirable than the flimsy chassis QMI used on the factory manufactured models.
Wow that name is truly a blast from the past. I had one in for service a long time ago. It was pretty well built. A lot of room under the cover. Unfortunately, I don't have a circuit diagram for it. I remember visiting Quatre and talking at length to the head of the company but for the life of me I can't remember his name. Big heavy set guy that's all I remember. The amp wasn't bad. That was around the time I was working for a company that made speakers for John Iverson in the San Fernando Valley while going to college. That was a trip!
my dg100 died after only a few years after buying it out the door of the factory in the San Fernando valley. The factory replaced the circuit boards with 250 models, and it has worked
since without any problems. Great bass no hum or vibration as mentioned earlier.

My question is what is the output impedance? I've run it into
B&W DM5's, both as a parallel pairs and singularly- 8 v's 4 ohms. As it is now "long in the tooth", I'm concerned about which configuration is healthier. BTW I also use an APT preamp.
I would be rather careful what you choose to connect to it as some of those amps were not particularly stable with all loads. They liked to blow up a lot. I would probably keep it between 4-8 ohms. No low or complex impedance i.e. no electrostats or ribbons. Resistive as opposed to capacitive.
Wow an Apt Holman Preamp. Make sure the Apt isn't outputting any DC. If I'm not mistaken, that was a AC (capacitor coupled) preamp.
In SD?
Try Stereo Design off of Clairmont Mesa, near where it crosses the 805.


Been there 20+ years and have a huge operation.
I'm in L.A. if you are closer.
I used to work at Quatre when they were on Remmet in Chatsworth (or was that Canoga Park?)   The heavy-set guy's name was Guy Hickey. 

If you were running a 8 ohm load the amps were fine.   6 okay.   But if dipped below 4 ohms - I wouldn't use it. 

That said, they had a great sound. The bass was nothing less than awesome - still is.  I'm not sure if you could buy a better bass amp for any money now - but then I've never done a comparison test with anything modern.  I do remember the Dahlquists were a little bass-shy - but the Gain Cell made  world of different.  I was their sales and marketing guy and I advertised the amp as being a better solution than buying the Dahlquist sub.   And it did sound better.   TIGHT. EXCITING BASS.  The Dahlquist sub was kinda tubby-sounding.   I remember someone brought in a pair of AR3a's.   A vintage, but respected speaker at the time.  The bass on the gain cell blew away the owner (and everyone in the shop - I remember getting everyone in the back - the factor - to come and listen. It was a real "wow" moment.)   Sealed cabinet speakers just went crazy for this amp.   But when they went, they went into DC offset - and shot out a nice spurt of DC - which would just push the woofer out and melt the voice coil in place.  Awful.