2. digital
  3. 1271439285

Puccini+Uclock vs APL NWO 4.0 SE vs PD MPS-5

Surely some of you have compared these 3 CD-SACD players, the Puccini with the U-clock vs the others two, my questions is how they compares between them, mostly when are used to play CD.

SECOND:if you think that the PD or the APL are a better option-sound than the Puccini+Uclock , the second question can be: As I own the Puccini with the U-clock, and here Europe, is practically imposible to hear the PD and very difficult the APL, do you think that the option of to buy one Scarlatti DAC, and use the Puccini as transport, can be better than the APL or the PD. Thanks.
newly

Showing 3 responses by dob

dob
577 posts
 
APL Production, today, is in Europe not USA and chief designer Alex Pechyev spent time in-bettween USA and Europe - so it should be easy for you to contact Alex.
PD is very, very good but APL has tube output and I always been a sucker for (GOOD!!!)tube stage.

Good Luck in your search,
Rafael
dob
577 posts
 
Questions to Jonathan Tinn:

Great front end. My most sincere congratulations. Let me exploit your presense in this forum.

Dud you ever considered (GOOD) tube output stage?
Will you consider it?

When your USB input will start to accept 176/24 and 192/24 data streaming from musical server?

Can you share with us what are you "cooking" now in your magic kitchen?

Many thanks
Rafael
dob
577 posts
 
"There is too much distortion and noise produced by tubes."

Thank you Carlos for your astute observation. Let me also to add something.

Noise: I have new Joule-Electra preamp which got Harry Pearson's 2010 HP Editor Choice Award. OK, when I place my ear next to my speakers I hear...nothing, nada, ziltch. Total silence as in SILENCE. (The measured noise was of about 50 uV).

Distortions: The best BAT, CAT, Joule-Electra preamps have measured distortions (THD) less of 0.01%. Not much!!!!!!

All The Best

Rafael
More to discover