Danyal - All three listed, having their own "flavor" are very good options. Much will depend on the sound flavor you are attempting to dial-in (in fact, the Velocitor and BPT units are rather much sonic opposites). Having owned and enjoyed each, (if the dollars enable) I would also add the new Bybee Wire conditioner to your demo ... it could be a major surprise.
PS Audio PPP vs. Velocitor vs. BPT 3.5
Hi,
I am looking into power conditioning/passive options and am wondering if there is a clear choice between the PPP, Velocitor S, and BPT 3.5.
My system consists of: PS Audio PerfectWave DAC (Source), Tom Evans Linear A, Zu Audio Definitions.
I have tried the PS Audio PPP and it definitely makes a big difference. Sound is tighter and more coherent. Highs and clearer too.
Based on the voltage readout, the voltages fluctuates by ~3V. So it seems fairly constant. In this case would I be better off going with a passive option? Could the Velocitor / BPT be better?
I am looking into power conditioning/passive options and am wondering if there is a clear choice between the PPP, Velocitor S, and BPT 3.5.
My system consists of: PS Audio PerfectWave DAC (Source), Tom Evans Linear A, Zu Audio Definitions.
I have tried the PS Audio PPP and it definitely makes a big difference. Sound is tighter and more coherent. Highs and clearer too.
Based on the voltage readout, the voltages fluctuates by ~3V. So it seems fairly constant. In this case would I be better off going with a passive option? Could the Velocitor / BPT be better?