Stick with escargot. In this case, it's a match made in heaven--with your Mini Utopias, that is. I'm Passion-ate over mine....peace, warren
23 responses Add your response
Mark Levinson 383 - this is overpriced stuff, though a nice match to your Mini U
Jeff Rowland Concerta II - good match, you may consider to grap.
Yba Passion - no idea, but YBA sounds thin from my years
Pathos Logos - cool look, shall be a good combo to MiniU
Musical Fidelity TriVista (or Nuvista) - this is more or less matching your other system, though I dont think it sounds better than Concentra II
Krell KAV 300iL/500iL - forget KAV series, out of range in terms of quality among amps mentioned above
Electrocompaniet ECI 4 - new model, quite powerful, your MiniU will be shaking.
Audio Analogue Maestro - over rated amp, HiFi Choice rating 3 out of 5 on sonic performance only.
Hope these help.
If you like the sound of solid state, then the YBA Passion is probably the way to go. If you would like something a little smoother (at least to my ears it was) and 110 watts is enough for the Utopias, I would recommend the Pathos Logos. I haven't heard every integrated out there but I have heard more than my share and the Logos to date is the best I personally have heard. It just brings more emotion out of the music than the others I have heard. It sounds like (what used to be known as)the Pathos Twin Towers with three times the power. At $4k, it ain't cheap but to me it was worth every penny. Regardless of what you are leaning towards, if it is at all possible go and listen to your choice(s) for yourself.
The 383 is my pick. Overpriced? Not in my book. Setup and matched correctly, I personally love it. Part of the draw for the 383 is the features it offers. No integrated on the market can compete with its features. I also believe the sound quality to be top notch. Comparing the Plinius to the 383 is not fair, the plinius can't keep up. Just my opinion.
I have owned the Jeff Rowland Concentra II and the Mark Levinson 383 of those mentioned - I downsized from a system that included the Utopias.
I never really cared for the Levinson sound in general BUT let me say that the Levinson 383 was the very best solid state integrated I could find.
The Rowland was perhaps the most beautiful piece of audio gear I have owned (and by no means the most expensive) and it had great build quality.
The Mark Levinson - and this is true of all the Levinson electronics in my opinion - is just unmatched in ergonomics and flexibility. The build is unsurpassed. It is a touch on the dark side of neutral and very detailed. At worst it lacks the texture of the Rowland and it can be "buttoned down" but in truth Mark Levinson equipment has come a long way (in my opinion) from the early, more sterile days....By the way, I have always preferred Krell to Levinson equipment (having owned a KSA 300s years ago) and I can tell you NOT to even bother with the Krell integrateds as they are not in the same league with either the Levinson or the Rowland (in my opinion). Can't Speak to the NuVista issue 'cause I haven't heard them.
If you can do tubes and have the money, the best Tubed integrated I have heard is the Tenor.
You need to check out the BAT 300x. You can have the best of both world's with their hybrid models with the tube being in the preamp section. I did hear the BAT with JM labs speakers (don't know the model) and it sounded great. I compared the BAT with the Rowland and like the BAT better. You could not go wrong with either the BAT or Rowland. I have not heard the 383 but would assume it to be in the same league with BAT & Rowland. Good luck.