Pass Labs Aleph Question - balanced vs unbalanced?



I have a Pass Labs Aleph 5. I also have a Supratek Chardonnay Pre-Amp with balanced and unbalanced out. Do people think the Pass Amps sound better through balanced vs unbalanced? I understood that they were truly engineered to run balanced for best sound quality, but am not sure.

I am having a problem with balanced operation (that I don't want to mention here so I don't complicate my question), so I'm trying to see if its worth figuring the other problem out or just sticking with unbalanced.
lightminer

Showing 4 responses by ghostrider45

The Alephs are a single ended design, so the balanced signal must be converted to single ended before driving the power stage. I use a pair of aleph 1.2 monos and have run them both single ended and balanced. They sound terrific either way, and I can't say that balanced is any better.
A push-pull amp topology requires two signals 180 deg out of phase. Each phase feeds either the push or the pull section of the output stage. When driven by a single ended signal, the push-pull stage is always preceded by a phase splitter to generate the correct signals. A balanced input can bypass the phase splitter since it conveniently contains two signals 180 deg out of phase. This saves a bit of active circuitry.

For single ended amps like the Alephs, the situation is reversed. A single ended signal goes straight to the first gain stage, while a balanced signal must go through additional circuitry to subtract the negative phase of the balanced signal from the positive phase, thus achieving common mode rejection and a doubling of the signal voltage.

Pass claims to do this via a passive network. I can't think of a passive method other than a transformer.

A single ended connection lets you avoid this passive circuitry at the expense of common mode rejection. For short cable lengths I don't think noise pickup is much of an issue and I'd rather avoid the extra circuitry.

My system plays both sides of this equation, A Pass XONO crossover high pass section feeds the Aleph 1.2 monos via a single ended connection, which in turn drive the ribbon panels of a pair of Apogee Studio Grands. The low pass section of the XONO drives a pair of Aragon Palladium II monos via balanced connection, which in turn drive the integral Studio Grand subs. The Paladiums are a tradition push pull design that omits the phase splitter and requires a balanced signal to operate (the single ended models just add a phase splitter).

One last thing - the first generation Alephs used a separate pull stage that took effect when the amp approached clipping. These operated push-pull over part of their range. The second generation (including Aleph 1.2 and 5) dropped the pull stage and simplified to 2 gain stages. They never move into push pull operation under any conditions.
Wloeb - I concur. The differential pair is certainly no passive circuit, though. By definition 2, the Aleph does not not require a differential input for its operation, so bypassing the additional circuitry when connected to a source that is not truly differential makes sense. This is especially true for short cable runs.

The Pass XONO that serves as the source to my amps is a non-differential implementation that creates a balanced output via a phase splitter at each output.
Pass the dunce cap - I referred to the Pass "XONO" Crossover in my previous posts - should have been the Pass XVR1 Crossover. Slip of the acronyms...