Opinion on Music Hall A50.2 integrated amp


I am thinking about a Music Hall A50.2 integrated amp. The speakers could be infinity CS3009s, VS VR 2s or Vandersteen 2Ces. How would this amp compare to to the classic amops of the 80s from Denon, HK, Rotel, NAD and so on. I should point out I have tried many under $1200 integrated amps made in the 10 years and find most of them to be very clean but thin/lean, over detailed, and not very musical. This is common complaint one hears. From the standpoint of sounding like music the Exposure 2010s was wonderful but no headphone jack or phono stage built in. The NAD c325/ 326 Bee were impressive even more then there bigger brothers I tried but they feel so...
I know the Music Hall is well built. What does it sound like? thanks
128x128geph0007

Showing 2 responses by darkstar1

If I were you I would buy the internal exposure phono card. Then spring for headphone amp when funds come available. Exposure really does punch above its price in several ways. You can find amps that best it in some things but to me it's different not out right better.

You will have to spend a lot more to beat the exposure on all fronts. The older exposure line can get you even more for your money. If you into exposure sound go with it.
If I were you I would buy the internal exposure phono card. Then spring for headphone amp when funds come available. Exposure really does punch above its price in several ways. You can find amps that best it in some things but to me it's different not out right better.

You will have to spend a lot more to beat the exposure on all fronts. The older exposure line can get you even more for your money. If you into exposure sound go with it.