2. analog
  3. 170029-5898

On ''what there is''

The question looks ''philosophical'' in the sense of ''what exist?''. In the old terminology ''ontology question''.
The modern formulation (by Quine) is: ''what are the values of your variables''? In our hobby ''what are
the new available components''?  Can one person know what are available components? Obviously not
but we have ''collective knowledge''. Each contribution is welcome. Like in science. But like in science there
are individuals with special contributions. Raul with his MM contributions and his ''successor'' chakster
with his contributions about ''both kinds'': MC's and MM's. Despite his ''modest means''. I think we should
be thankful to have such individuals.
128x128nandric
nandric's avatar
nandric OP
4,086 posts
 
I expected Lew to ''shine in'' regarding English as second language.
He participated in many scientific gatherings so he must be
confronted with ,say, ''Chinese or Japanese English''. Deed he
understand his colleague with ''bad English'' or deed he avoid
them  because of ''language problem''? I assume scientific terminology familiar to all members of the same ''domain'' of
research. 


nandric's avatar
nandric OP
4,086 posts
 
pedroeb, never heard ''cogito ergo sum''?
streamerdude
54 posts
 
This thread is a perfect example of a moderator who feels intimidated by jabberwocky. 
arro222
142 posts
 
So, the penchant of providing "philosophy" to audiophillia, finally points to the disease.
nandric's avatar
nandric OP
4,086 posts
 
streadmerdude, Are you forced by someone to react to this
thread? You can simply pass over. There are more threads.
Nothing to your liking? BTW you can complain by the moderator.
An novice with 51 posts so not well informed. 
More to discover