CDC and FDA (can’t remember who exactly sets these rules) are set up so that if a prophylactic exists for a given condition..then..experimental ’treatments’ for the contentious conditions, cannot go forward, and the known prophylactic goes forward.
This meant that if ivermectin was found to be effective, no mRNA experimental treatments would ever have been allowed to reach the public of the united states and thus their ability to be used across the entire would would have likely been shuttered and shunned by most of the world’s nation-state governing bodies.
Pfizer, for one, would probably be $200 billion dollars poorer at this time. Never mind all the rest of it that remains unspoken.
For mRNA treatments (they are not vaccines) to be allowed to be used on the citizens of the USA, in their experimental and unapproved form, Ivermectin would have to never be useful to treat covid. No evidence of ivermectin efficacy could ever officially reach the CDC/FDA pairing, at all. Or any other drug/product, either.
Thus, ivermectin was forced to be sidelined. As were others.
There is considerable data and news stories and reporting to illustrate that there was something big going on with regard to blocking all efforts that were outside of the approval of the mRNA treatments for experimental use on people.
Isn’t that just so darned interesting. It makes one think.
FYI ....at the least, there are three ex-heads of CDC/FDA departments, that are now directly on the boards of the major pharmaceutical corporations involved in the proffered experimental mRNA treatments.
There are dozens more interesting points out there about this situation, that do not appear in the mainstream news ~at all~.
~~~~~~~~~
One of those points not found in the news:
IF...a mRNA treatment is finally given approval for use on humans, as an approved treatment, then the public of the united states can sue the given corporation that issued the mRNA treatment. The us public can sue the given pharmaceutical corporation for damages and injuries.
Pfizer mRNA product--- has been approved for use on humans.
But. A really big but.
Pfizer is ..apparently....still not issuing the approved mRNA treatment for humans, in the USA.
They are still issuing the experimental version, which they cannot be sued over the use of.
There exists a pathway for a pharmaceutical company to gain total immunity from being sued over the side effects or health effects of a given mRNA treatment.
That.... is when the given mRNA treatment (or actual vaccine or whatnot)is finally approved for use on ALL citizens of the USA, specially that of children, down to the level of being approved on newborns.
What do we see? We see the lack of issuance of the actual approved product which Pfizer could be sued over..., the quiet and continued distribution/use of the product that Pfizer can’t be sued over... and a tremendous push to gain approval for the use of the mRNA treatment on children and newborns.
The product is being made and used up all the time.
Pfizer could have issued and handed out approved and properly named/labelled vials of their approved product in almost minutes after approval, yet they have not done so.
There is no viable innocent looking reason for this situation of non-approved varieties still being the only ones in use and circulation, anywhere.
