Need suggestions for streaming files to my stereo


Hello everyone. I'm looking for a way to stream files (AAC, ALAC, FLAC) to my home stereo. The files are on my PC laptop, or on iTunes on my iPhone etc. I pretty much exhausted my budget on my power amp and speakers so Im looking for the best budget pieces I can afford to get the music flowing for now. I currently have Kef ks50s, a Red Dragon S500, a SMSL Sanskrit, and a Google Chromecast Audio.   I'll likely pick up a Schiit SYS preamp. 

With this current setup I can only pretty much stream Pamdora, since Itunes won't work with the CCA.   It's looking like the lowest cost option available is to use different software to handle the music files such as JRiver, or PowerDVD Ultra, but I'm unsure if this is the best way?  Any other ideas, software, hardware etc?  I have an insanely low budget of around $200 left to buy the rest, let's see what you guys can think of. 
autre

Showing 3 responses by williewonka

+1 for the Bluesound !

- Amazing sound
- supports the most well known streaming services
- access to a huge selection of radio stations (global)
- forward looking design
- intuitive interface
- great software that works
- the unit and interface design makes life simple
- basic manual controls on each box are a huge plus
- extremely high quality music - even via the analogue outputs
- performance improves using high quality cables (power and IC's)

I started with the Powernode 2 for my A/V system and was so impressed I went out an bought the Node 2 for my Audio system, replacing my computer and DAC. I now have the Pulse Mini for outdoor music.

Regards - Steve
@erik_squires - re:

One reason not to use Bluesound: Seems to be single band WiFI.

But most apartment dwellers are saturated with WIfi signals in the 2.4GHz band. 5GHz is far more reliable. Wired Ethernet even more so.
That issue applies to all streaming devices - not just Bluesound - correct?

Or is it Bluesound’s higher res capability that creates problems more than others when using wireless?

I know I have issues playing 24/192 wirelessly, but 24/96 is fine - then again,  I have an old wireless router

Cheers
@erik_squires - first, my apologies for the long post but my analytical mind got the better of me ...

Granted, there may be some advantages to dual band - mainly because currently there are many more 2.4 GHz devices than 5 GHz.

From what I have gleaned from the web...
The primary differences between the 2.4 GHz and 5GHz wireless frequencies are range and bandwidth. 5GHz provides faster data rates at a shorter distance, whereas 2.4GHz offers coverage for farther distances, but may perform at slower speeds

I have also been told the 5GHz signal does not penetrate walls as effectively as the 2.4 GHz signal from both an Audio store that installs gear and a friend in the computer sales business..

And If the trend is towards dual band, then other devices like phones will also use them and the 5GHz band will suffer from the same "congestion and interference" that 2.4GHz suffers today in the not to distant future.

Even though I have problems playing 24/192 resolution files wirelessly, Bluesound specifies their wireless solution works at 2.4GHz. Unfortunately, I believe my router is responsible (it was cheep and cheerful).

From Bluesound Support:

Wireless Signal Strength:
  • For streaming 44.1/16 content: -70dBm
  • For streaming 96/24 content: -55dBm
  • For streaming 192/24 content: -45dBm
  • It is good to note that the source for your local music can also be affected by poor wireless signal strength. If possible, we recommend it be connected directly to your router via a wired Ethernet connection for best performance, as moving from wireless connection to wireless connection can cause issues over weaker networks.
And a response from one happy Bluesound customer:
extremely happy with my ASUS RT-AC66U Dual Band 3x3 802.11AC Gigabit Router; haven’t had a dropout since I got it

But even their success would be dependent on the proximity of their router in relation to the Bluesound device.


I think the bottom line is that all current wireless solutions are far from perfect.

- Dual band solves the congestion and bandwidth aspects, but also suffer from the coverage issue

- success really depends on the router selected and the location in which it is being used. Specifically in relation to the component connected to it


I get your point that devices these days should be dual band, but having worked in the manufacturing end of micro electronics - it’s tough to roll out up to date products, because the end-to-end process gets extremely complex and in today’s world of integrated circuits - what seems like a simple "Die Revision" (i.e. a simple change to the silicon chip) can result in component failure, unleashing a flurry of calls to the support personnel.


Granted, cell phones seem to roll out every 5 minutes and use the very latest technologies, but they have their problems and their development effort, by comparison, is enormous.

Personally, I believe the people at Bluesound have found something that works and they are sticking with it.


Until sample rates greater than 24/192 become common place in the various streaming services and for the purchase of digital music (I’m thinking "iTunes like" outlets here) then a single band solution will suffice in this case.


If a person wants greater than 24/192, then there will always be the more esoteric brands to satisfy their lust

But eventually I believe Bluesound will catch up with todays technology at some point.


Cheers - Steve :-)