The NAD C326BEE is excellent. That would be my choice.
5 responses Add your response
Usually, NAD integrateds tend to be more reliable than their NAD CD player brothers (no moving mechanism involved).
I have owned a NAD 352 for 5 years without any problem. I gave it to my brother last year when I moved out and he still uses it every day, hooking to his Totem Rainmakers & REL Q201E.
I currently own a NAD 326BEE for about 8 months. I have no problem whatsoever so far with the NAD 326BEE.
The thing with NAD integrateds is that if they break down; they will break down within the 1st year of ownership. After that they hardly have any problems.
I do like CA too. CA amps & CD players are also very nice budget electronics like NAD. However, I do not know anything about CA products'reliability.
I am a big fan of Dynaudio so I prefer NAD. They have good chemistry with NAD.
Marantz PM 5003 got a good review by Bob Reina at Stereophile. I have seen one listed here on A'gon for $375. Check it out.
Two or three years ago I went down to Son Idéal in Montreal to listen and compare entry-level amps and CD players. We'd had a fire and the systems in the bedrooms were going to be replaced.
I listened to two Cambridge units, the 540 and 640, and compared them with the NAD C320BEE. I preferred the NAD. I thought it was smoother overall. Both Cambridges had some roughness in the highs and upper mids, although the more expensive 640 had a bit less.
So we got three NAD C320BEE integrateds. They have been working just fine since we got them.