My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab

Showing 50 responses by ron17

viber

I have a better idea....at zero cost to you. Why don't you choose a piece of music that you think would best represent your system and record it with your phone, the same way Jay has been doing for months. Then send it to him so he can play it on his youtube channel for all of us to see and hear. We would not only get a taste of the music you think should be used to evaluate gear but also we would finally be able to see your system, the way you've set it up and the neutrality of it.....Maybe then we would better understand your point of view.  
@ viber6

You criticized me for using the term 'almost tube like' when describing the midrange and top end of a solid state amp and then 2 days later you use the term 'mellow'.    Hmmm..... mellow could be construed as a recessed (as apposed to a forward) presentation, lacking in bass information, rolled off top end, rolled off midrange, warm as opposed to cool.  I think this common definition of "mellow" should be scrapped in favor of more informative descriptions of sound.
almarg was the go to guy for any audio technical questions in this forum. He posted several times on this thread when we were all stumped and needed questions answered. So sad to hear he is very sick.....makes me realize just how fragile we all are. I will really miss his thoughtful and informative posts.

https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/update-on-audiogon-member-almarg
I have been using Nordost cables for over 15 years and never once have I ever heard them called 'mushy'....Fast, detailed, lean (version 1 only) just to name a few but mushy would be the exact opposite description of a Nordost cable.
Nordost has cable loaner kits all the way up to Valhalla 2.  As far as loaning out Odin 1&2, that would be up to the dealer to loan out their own demo cables. Usually Odin 1&2 are used in their top systems. Depends on the size and stock of the dealer....I have taken home an Odin 1 PC for 2 days and 1 night when the dealer was closed for their days off.
if i was actually contemplating spending odin kind of money i would think long and hard about spending the funds on an even higher level of gear, if possible.

Wow.......have you seen the OP's rig?

BTW the Odin 1's have unbelievable bass.
I've owned Nordost cables for over 15 years and have gone through almost every model. I found the original series (version 1) cables lean in the lower midrange upper bass area, but paired with a warm, laid back system they were a hard combo to beat. I had an all BAT (tube preamp and tubed monos) system with original Valhalla's 15 years ago that was such a great combo. I don't think the original Valhalla's paired with a forward, bright or lean system would be a good match. As with everything in audio it's all about synergy and proper matching.

I now have a mix of Valhalla 2's and Odin 1's in my system. They are warm, rich, detailed, refined and have a 'reach out and touch the vocalist' feel/sound to them. As far as being a bit tilted up in the highs and cut a bit on lower midrange richness density I'd have to say that poster has not heard them.

I think WCSS' offer to pay round trip shipping to anyone willing to send their cable for a comparison is a great idea. Would love to see that happen and I know if WC found your cable more to his liking (in his system) he would be honest and report it.

There are so many great sounding cables out there....so difficult to try them all.
"ezzigi, agreed with that review, Nordost Valhalla or Odin for power cable NO ( much overpriced)" 

"Shunyata for power cable YES. Nordost Valhalla 2 or Odin for speaker cables YES. Nordost top tier speaker cables are the best you can find. They are truly remarkable. Expensive yes, but the very best have a cost. Not their powercables though."

techno, Are your statements on Nordost power cords based on actual listening tests in your system or dealer showroom? Or are they based on price alone?
Speaking of conditioners...I still think you should try Nordost's Qbase8. Since you now finally have an all Nordost loom it would be worth a try. I believe the retail is $1800 and I'm sure you could do better than that. It really made a big difference in my all Nordost system. I would love to get your impression of it vs the AQ Niagara.
@thezaks  

Hey Dave, I kinda remember a while back when you were interested in multi channel amps and asked WC about the Odeon. Without going back and searching this thread to find out the issues you had....what happened? I've heard such great things about it.


@thezaks 

Actually I had a similar problem. I've owned a Classe CA-5100 amp for years and really love it for 2 channel and HT applications. I completed a home remodel a few years ago and soon started having problems with that amp. After 1 hour of listening it would go into protection mode and shut down. This happened dozens of times over the course of a year. I had no idea what was going on. I talked to a tech at Classe several times who thought it was overheating, but it had plenty of space around it. I ended up sending it in for repairs. When they got the amp and checked the computer log within it they called me right away. The first thing they asked me was have you remodeled your home lately and added LED lights and or dimmers to your lighting? I had done both. They said the amp was sensitive to RF noise created by dimmers, LED lights and general AC pollution caused by a number of things. It had been fine for years until I did my remodel and then all hell broke loose! They did what they called a 'Japan Fix' on the amp....which was to expand the tolerance of the protection mode circuit. They said all of their amps sent to Japan had to be designed that way because of all of the RF pollution there......Long story but when I got the amp back I never had another problem with it. I've had many amps since my remodel and never had a problem with them..... Bottom line is every amp has different tolerances to RF noise/AC pollution.  
From Nordost website:

Are Nordost cables directional?

Yes, Nordost cables are directional. This is especially true for single ended (RCA) interconnects as the shield is connected at the source or output end only.

How can cables be directional?

When cables are manufactured they do not have any directionality. However, as they break in, they acquire directionality.
Although the cable signal is an alternating current, small impurities in the conductor act as diodes allowing signal flow to be better in one direction over time. This effect is also called quantum tunneling, which has been observed in experiments over 25 years ago. Regardless of the purity of the metal used, there are still diode effects in all conductors. In addition, the insulation material will change when it is subjected to an electrical field.


That being said I don't think the Odin1 speaker cables will sound their best until they are FULLY broken in.  If I spent Odin1 money I would definitely have the retailer break them in on Nordost's Vidar (break-in machine) for the suggested 210 hours.  Whether WC decides to do that or not is completely up to him. 
@psnyder149

So much to learn by picking the brains of manufactures and retailers at properly set-up demos. Thanks for taking the time to share your experience.
Great sounding amp!

Can't be a Pass Labs amp or it would have melted the cover off.
I played in rock bands for years and have attended 100's of LOUD concerts. Around 15 years ago I developed tinnitus and hyperacusis in my left ear. I still of course listen to music daily just at low levels. Loud concerts are now out of the question and even small acoustic venues require me to use ear protection.

That's living.
Thank you schubert. I really shouldn't have said 'that's living'. I was responding to dep14's post about how much fun loud rock concerts are (which I totally agree with). I just had too much fun and ended up damaging my hearing. BTW I think the difference between a classical music concert and a typical rock concert is about 20db.  
@WCSS,

Your views on cables and after market power cords have changed in the last year or so. Do you see yourself experimenting with isolation products in the near future?
@viber6

Thank you so much for clarifying what the OP is trying to say. It's so very difficult to understand him sometimes.
Amp rating:

A couple of things....after naming each category (1-10) and describing each one in detail and giving examples of each one, when you did finally go through and rate the Sim 860a v2 you skipped over category #6 (Soundstage Width & Depth). I had to go back and re-listen, write down each score in each category, add them up to deduce that category #6 = a rating of 6....no thoughts on why you rated it a 6....no big deal.

Also by using a rating system of 100 I'm guessing that the scores could range from 10-100. 10 being the worst score (1 point per each of the 10 categories) and 100 being the top score. I realized no amp could possibly score a 100. You stated that an amp either falls into either one of two categories....#4 Sweetness or #5 Slam & Dynamics. So no amp will score a 10 in both categories...right?
 
You described the 'Sweetness' category as "amps that are very sweet...like tubes". I don't want to get into the old 'tube amps are colored' thing but I very much agree with the YouTube poster 'stephen barnes' who posted on your channel saying...
 
"I don’t care for the way the sweetness rating is done. That skews sweet sounding amps with a higher score than a more neutral amp that maybe provides a better sound at neutral than one that is sweet but maybe dosnt stand up to the neutral amp in the quality of the sound. It assumes that sweet is the preference over neutral, since we are all trained to believe a higher number equates to better, where in this case it does not relate to better in my opinion."

Thanks Jay for all the hard work you put in for our enjoyment....it is much appreciated!
About 15 years ago I built a listening room within my garage. I did a lot of reading prior to determining the dimensions. I ended up with aprox. 16x22 although I angled the long wall so I could somewhat reduce parallel surfaces. Being a contractor I did most of the work myself. I used 2 layers of 5/8" drywall glued to studs and glued drywall to drywall. Used an acoustic drop-down ceiling and thick carpet on the cement floor. Of course I had an electrician run (4) dedicated 20a #10 wire lines for my components.

Good and Bad..... The good was I could blast away day and night and not bother other family members. I spent months setting speakers up in different ways, on different walls etc... The Bad was the room was completely sealed with no openings (like hallways, other rooms or open areas). At low listening levels the sound was great but at high listening levels the room kind of pressurized and had a closed in feeling/sound. I kept the room for 4-5 years then tore it down and moved back into the house to a room that was larger and that had hallways and open rooms adjoining the main room (for excess energy to escape/breathe).

My takeaway with this experiment is that if you are going to build a closed-in room within a garage you better be prepared to consult with an acoustician and spend some money on acoustic treatment to absorb excess energy. Looking at folkfreaks room (small and closed-in) but heavily treated (by a professional) is the way to get the best sound from that kind of room.

This is just my own personal experience....others may vary.

Definitely not trying to discourage you from building a dedicated listening room. Just saying it's not a slam dunk. A general contractor can easily build a room within a room but for it to sound good at listening levels of 80-90db is another thing altogether. Listening at low levels and at near field will have less room interaction but I know you like to crank it up.....I don't know folkfreak but he'd be the guy I would talk to if I wanted to do it right.
I totally appreciate the fact that Jay really loves 'sweet' sounding amps. It's just that he has two categories that are opposing...Sweetness vs Slam & Dynamics. If you score high in one you will score low in the other....according to the reviewer. And of course having one of each (amps) as a reviewer sounds like a must....just like having different sounding sets of cables etc.

I think the score of the Sim 860a v2 @ 71 is fantastic and right where it should be based on sound, value and all of the previous amps the reviewer has had and will have.

Jay, just curious how you would score the Luxman M900u in JUST the 2 categories of Sweetness and Slam & Dynamics?

Thanks again for your tireless work!
@WCSS

I'm guessing that your 'Overall Rating' of the Luxman M900u and the Simaudio 860a v2 are going to be fairly close.  Referring again to the two categories (Sweetness vs Slam/Dynamics) you said it is possible to improve the Sweetness category by using a preamp or cabling but can you improve the Slam/Dynamics category of an amp?

How would you improve the sweetness of the Sim 860a v2?

How would you improve the Slam/Dynamics of the Luxman M900u?
I have the Classe Amp5 that I use for HT. I’m guessing it is close in sound to the Amp2. I’ve tested it against my other Classe CA-5100, Plinius SB-301 mk2 and my current Simaudio 870a....all in 2 channel music listening. I found the Amp5 to be very unmusical, 2D sounding and lifeless compared to the CA-5100 (class A/B design). Not even remotely close to the Plinius or the Sim. However I do think it is a very good, powerful, small, lightweight and cool to light warm running home theater amp.
@WCSS

Why don't you just borrow some of riaa's gear to evaluate....might save you a few bucks.
@WCSS

Did you ever get the Valhalla 2 IC’s to try? My Nordost retailer told me the Valhalla 2 IC’s were a little more forward and fuller in the midrange than the Odin 1’s which he said were more neutral. Might be the perfect balance for your current set-up. FWIW
@WCSS

 I just finished re-wiring 2 dedicated 20a lines for my system. I used Audience's 'Hidden Treasure In-Wall AC Cable'. It was expensive but I have a short distance from my panel box to my system so I went for it. I figured if power cables make such a positive impact in sound quality why wouldn't AC cables from panel box to receptacle....I'm glad I did. The following is from Audience's website.

Hidden Treasure In-Wall AC Power Cable features three 10 AWG stranded 99.9999 percent pure oxygen-free copper (OFC) conductors. The wire is cryogenically treated to relieve stresses that can be imparted to the wire during manufacturing and to re-align the microstructure in the copper for improved conductivity. The conductors are foil-shielded to provide rejection from external electrical noise. The dielectric (insulation) is made from XLPE cross-linked polyethylene insulation with a PVC sleeve for unmatched durability.

Also as far as where to place your speakers, equipment, listening position...I think I would have your dedicated AC lines/outlets placed close to a corner so you would have the option of placing your equipment and more importantly your speakers on the long or short wall (which ever placement sounds best) in the room. To HAVE to place the speakers on 1 specific wall would be limiting. Having the option to choose where to place your speakers based on sound quality in that specific room would be invaluable.
@viber6

 Here you go again, giving advice and opinions that you have no personal experience with. You said:

"Listen to the music from the right channel, especially from older recordings with ping pong imaging, that is, exaggerated L/R separation. You will still find that the AQ has more detail than the Odin."

How would you know that? Have you performed this exact experiment? The OP said he didn't have (2) 20a Odin1 power cords to use for the amps so he couldn't actually compare the Nordost to the Audioquest cables on his amps. You said:

"This illustrates that the $48K Odin pair is way overpriced with inferior performance compared to the AQ Dragon HC pair at $18K."
 
Inferior performance? Based on what? Again the OP was not able to A/B 20a Audioquest cables with Nordost cables on his amps because he didn't have any 20a Nordost cables.
You were doing so well over the last couple of weeks....Maybe it's time to take another little break.
@ WCSS

I’m with you on the in-wall speakers for your HT, I use 2 for surrounds in mine. However using an in-wall for a center channel might not be the best for clear, articulate dialogue. I think using in-walls for your rears, surrounds and all of the height speakers would be great, but I think I would keep the Neo’s in the mix with a passthrough in your preamp to a processor/receiver and get a ML center channel to match the sound of the Neo’s. Place 2 subs in the back of the room and run your Neo’s full range. That way you get full range sound all around you and the 3 most important speakers (center and front L&R) your best speakers, are handling most of the critical information....I’m definitely not a HT guy so maybe someone with more HT knowledge can clean-up or expand on my thoughts.
Hey.....while we're spending your money, how about room treatments? There's Synergistic Research, ASC, GIK Acoustics, Vicoustic, Auralex, Stillpoints Aperture etc....Man you could do shootouts for months.
Actually he said  "Yes, I almost bought the AHB2 after a 60 day trial.  It didn't quite beat my unique Bryston 2.5B SST2 amp for clarity/neutrality, but it was close,"

So the order of best amps would be:

1 Bryston 2.5B SST2
2 Benchmark AHB2
3 Mephisto
4 Everything else
But just keep in mind....  You can try thinner carpets and less floor covering to liven it up.
Speaking of isolation ie. (stands, racks and footers), I use two brands of isolation. I use Critical Mass (shelf and Center Stage footers) and also Stillpoints (Ultra 6’s). In my time experimenting with both I have learned they each bring a different tone to the system. The Critical Mass devices are warmer and more holographic vs the Stillpoints Ultra 6’s being more sterile sounding...cooler. Both produce amazing results. Both bring out details and information you never knew was there, they just do it differently.... tonally speaking. I will in the future add more CM isolation and subtract the Stillpoints. I think with my Simaudio 870a amp, YG Carmel2 speakers and all Odin1 cables the Critical Mass pieces help balance out the tonality of my system.

It all comes down to system matching and tuning. The last video with the DAG gear was (on my crappy computer speakers) the best sound I have heard since the OP started his YouTube channel. It sounded so much better this last time than the first time he played the DAG gear. I’m guessing it was the combination of the ’sweet’ DAG preamp and amp tuned or offset by Nordost Odin1 cables and the Artesania amp stand.....I’m wondering if you might get similar results with an AR ref10 / Simaudio 860a v2 / Cardas Clear Beyond or Kubala Sosna Emotion cables? I understand the cost differences between the two systems...I’m thinking more of tuning a system to a more neutral presentation.
Knowing Jay for many years, no way he would take advantage of a return policy to review a speaker then send it back for a refund...not that kinda guy.
What I'm saying is I don't think Jay would ever buy a speaker for the purpose of reviewing it knowing he was going to send it back for a full refund less shipping.....Sounds a little unethical to me.  
Wow...with audio descriptive words like jangly and feathery, not so sure what to think anymore.
No need to answer for viber...I'm sure we'll get a detailed response.

BTW Jay, do you plan on rating the Gryphon and D'Agostino amps while you still have them? Curious how you rate them compared to the more affordable Sim and Lux amps using your new and improved rating system.
Yeah I'm with kren on this one.  I thought the mic recording (1st one) sounded richer, warmer and more detailed....also the stereo aspect sounded better.  The phone recording sounded more defused.  Work on the mic gain level and I think it's a winner.