Although I use monitors and a sub (see system), I have to say that there is something about a full range speaker. I will also say that for the price (and a small room) monitors and a sub bring something else to the table. Again I will agree with the others above, much depends on room, and how the sub integrates with your monitors. What is interesting is if I did own a set of full range speakers, that when down around 25-30hz, I would still fill the need to get a sub. Rel says that any speaker that cannot produce bass below 20hz can benefit greatly from there subs.
Monitor with sub or Full Range Speakers
I have a budget of $3,000.00 for a pair of used speakers. I am buying used so that I can maximized my choices. My listening is mostly jazz, old R&B, and contemporary Christin music.
I have seen speakers in this range for monitors like JM Lab Micro Utopia for $2,000 and then I would add sub-woofer. Or Tyler Acoustics Linbrook Sig System 2pc for $3,200.00 shipped. Is there a big difference in sound between monitors and a good sub or a full range. I have only owned full range speakers and thought I might try something different.
Looking for comments from those who have owned both and why they preferred one or the other.
My room is about 18 x 14 with 9ft ceilings.
Equipment:
CD player is Cary 306/200
LSA Signature Integrated Amp
Verastarr Cables and interconnects
BPT ac conditioner
Thanks.
I have seen speakers in this range for monitors like JM Lab Micro Utopia for $2,000 and then I would add sub-woofer. Or Tyler Acoustics Linbrook Sig System 2pc for $3,200.00 shipped. Is there a big difference in sound between monitors and a good sub or a full range. I have only owned full range speakers and thought I might try something different.
Looking for comments from those who have owned both and why they preferred one or the other.
My room is about 18 x 14 with 9ft ceilings.
Equipment:
CD player is Cary 306/200
LSA Signature Integrated Amp
Verastarr Cables and interconnects
BPT ac conditioner
Thanks.