MIT's not good for tube components?



I was at a hi-fi store the other day and started chatting with the owner regarding improving my system and such. We got to the subject of cables, and I mentioned that I was using MIT 2 biwire for speaker cables and MIT 330 shotguns for IC's. He quickly mentioned that I needed to get new cables, because MIT's weren't good for tube components. I wasn't sure if he was trying to get me to buy cables from him or if in fact MIT's are deficient for tube components.

Any comments regarding this?

Also, if you have any recommendations for speaker cables and IC's that may mate well with my system, I would appreciate them.

My system:
Vandersteen 2ce sig
Eastern Electric Minimax tube CDP
TAD-150 sig tube preamp
McCormack DNA-1 deluxe
drewyou

Showing 1 response by gundam91

I've been using the MIT MI330 Proline (XLR) for ages. Tried a pair of friend's Nordost Quattro Fil a while back out of curiousity and it sounded so bright and shrill that my ears started to "bleed". This thread got me interested in this topic again and I had my friend bring over his PAD Proteus over to try last weekend. Well, the Proteus had more air, more extension, better bass control and impact, more resolution, more transparent, etc. But the MI330 sounded warmer and had more body/weight to Holly Cole's voice.

To answer the original question regarding tubes and MIT cables, maybe it's true (for earlier MIT cables). Our theory (and it's only a theory) is that if your system is overly bright, then it can be tamed with MIT cables. Maybe that's why Thiels (which I have) were always using MIT cables when paired with SS amps.

So Proteus was not the answer for me. Next, I'm trying a pair of Pure Note Paragon Enhanced....

Disclaimer: Can't speak to the later offerings from MIT. I just cannot stomach paying that kind of money for cables.

FrankC