MHDT Labs DAC: Havana or Paradisea+ ?

High.

I've had the Paradisea+ for six months. As most who have heard this DAC will claim, ... I love it. It strikes a wonderful balance between detail, musicality and ease that works so great with my Grado RS1's.

That said ...

"Mouse," at MHDT labs was gracious enough to loan me a new Havana for this weekends Houston Head-fi meet.

I just got it today and even pre burn in (really just caps and fuse since it has no opamp) I'm noticing pretty dramatic differences over the Paradisea+.

Number 1: Significantly more detailed; could be a plus or a minus depending on your preferences. But the detail is several notches more with the Havana. This might have to do with the lack of an OPAMP.

Number 2: More "air" and space to the instrument seperation. Again, fairly substantial of a difference. This, of course, enhances the soundstage effect (which I personally sort of like).

Number 3: Technically as nit picky as I can be, ... the Havana is not as utterly smooth and seductive as the Paradisea+

The Paradisea+, though slightly narrower sounding and slightly less detailed, still possesses this unbelievable ease about the way it delivers the music.

On the flipside of that same idea, some folks would call the Paradisea+ sluggish or 'blurred' compared to the Havana.

The Havana is smooth as well ... just not quite as "buttery" smooth as the Paradisea+.

This very initial difference in the DACs could very well change once the brand new Havana has 200 or more hours on it (my Paradisea+ is pushing 1000 hours easy).

Anyway.

Just some thoughts ...

@Musicman

The tube question is interesting.

I've listened to the Havana with my standard Paradisea+ fav tube, a Bendix 2C51 as well as with a NOS Tung Sol 396A.

What I've found though is that I prefer the more "tubey" sounding, more lush Tung Sol 396A over the more detailed and "airy" Bendix 2C51 in the Havana.

The opposite is true in regards to my Paradisea+.

In regards to my listening preferences ... in general ... I do not like an end product (sound) that is in anyway "digital" sounding.

I like sound that communicates as it would in a room with live performers ... and frankly, most digital delivery systems don't meet that mark.

The Paradisea+ does meet that mark and it meets it well.

The Havana, as well, meets that "live music sound" benchmark ... but to my ear, more so when using a warmer sounding, more liquid tube like the 396A variants.

It's still quite decent with the Bendix 2C51, but begins leaning towards the sharp side of things ... at least with my notoriously picky Grado RS1 headphones.

With something like Sennheiser HD650's ... with their legendary "laid back," smooth and "dark" sound ... my comments might be completely different.

Thanks for the word.

Best.

Just a little update to those interested in the Havana over the Paradisea+.

After a full 100 hours of, literally, constant play time ... the Havana has smoothed out quite dramatically.

It's really pretty mysterious to me what happens in the first 100+ play hours on a new piece of gear.

I had initially stated that the Havana lacked some of the liquid and utterly smooth musicality of the Paradisea+ ... while at the same time having noticeably more detail and a slightly better soundstage ...

Now ... though ...

Be it burn-in on caps, fuses or otherwise ...

The fact remains ...

The Havana is just as smooth and liquid as my older and tried and true Paradisea+ ... while still retaining the aforementioned edge in regards to detail and sound stage.

(I'm still using it with a Bendix 2C51 tube, btw)

Anyway ...

The improvement over the Paradisea+ is there ... but it's only something the most nit picky, very exacting of us would demand or notice.

That said ...

I count myself a member of that group, so ...

:-)

I'm going to try and figure out a way to keep this loaner DAC in my household.

Best.

Hope this is informative to you folks.

...