McIntosh Guy Going Tubes? (Maybe?)


Need some thoughts, comments, advice: present system (mainly McIntosh): Wilson Sabrina’s, MC601 monos, C52 pre, MEN220 room cor, MB50 streamer, MCD80 spinner, PSAudio P10 regenerator. My thoughts are to go analog/tubes via MC275 MKVI monos with C2600 pre(and undefined TT). Pros - Cons?
128x128bradlye
Thanks to everyone for their great input!  I think step 1 is going to be the tube preamp only addition.  Then maybe try tube amps (monos) later. Everything made sense, was cool and my mind was made up, until the recommendation to audition the C1100 was thrown in the mix. That screed-the-pooch. Now I’m trying to sort out C2600 vs. C1100.  Any new or additional thoughts from all of you on this caveat?

 I guess that’s what drives us and our great hobby.  “THE QUEST!”
bradlye, if you do a Google search on the C1100, you'll find a larger discussion on another forum.  Feel free to PM me if you would like more of my personal impressions.
I ran a C45 with a single MC275 and with Mono 601's. In my opinion the 601's were very close to the sound signature of the MC275, with more depth in the lower frequencies. The 275 placed the vocal/singer a step in front of the "band" and the 601's makes the singer/vocals take a step back. I love the power and ease the 601's drive my speakers. I love how the MC275 looks. I ended up selling the MC275. I'd love to try a C2500/C2600 in my system, but I tried the C2200 before and found I preferred an SS preamp. I say - keep the 601's and try the 2600 or 1100. Let us know how it goes!
I’m sure the C1100 is a step up from the C2600. 
C1100/MC601 combination would be awesome. I’m jealous.
You can always trade up to the C1100 (McIntosh have good resale value). I believe the C2600 is warmer and the C1100 is more resolving or SS leaning. For pure performance the C1100 will be better but the C2600 is already a great choice.