magnestand owners

The theory of panel stiffness and the resonant qualities of wood are 'sound'.
The reviews of listeners/buyers are almost universally positive.

MDF is awful stuff and while good for 'boxes', leaves something to be desired for panel frames.

I have NOT yet read an independent review.

And, don't forget that PG also sends you a substantially modified crossover 'at no charge'.......

If I had the loot, I'd sent him my panels in a heartbeat. Make mine Sepele.

I assume you've been to the Magnestand site and read it 'from cover to cover'......

Let US know what you think if you pursue this path. I'm convinced that my 1.6s can be taken to a level above the 1.7 for a lot less coin.....

Elizabeth:
No joke about the drool factor.
I'm taking woodshop so I can make my own frames and external crossover boxes.......

the mod to my mg 2a,s took them to a whole new level(crossover mods) ive had 1.6 speakers for about a year and have done pg crossover mods to them also! As i expected they went to a new level

Peter Gunn is a "back woods" Wood butcher, and his Magnestands match the Decor of a Log Cabin IMO! I like the "Stock" "Modern" look of Magnepans.

His "claims" of increased power efficiency are BS!

The "Stock" Xover is superior to Peter Gunn's IMO!

The Stock Xover was Designed and Patented By Nelson Pass!
It can be "Slightly" improved by substituting expensive inductors, capacitors, AND taking into account the resistance of the stock inductors.

For anyone to compare stock Maggie's to the magnestands is just plain crazy! For one the junk Solen capacitors and ceramic resistors are
Not even in the same league as the Jupiter capacitors or Mundorf,
The Duelund resisters That Gunn uses are the best in the world.
The hardwood frames donot allow all the vibration to come back to
The diaphragms and all the distortions like in the cheap mdf inthe stock frames.Ihave heard both side by side and the Magbestands are in another league,you would have to be deaf to not be able to hear the Huge improvement ! !

Don, have you ever seen or heard PG's modified Maggies?

Calling him a "back woods" wood butcher is a bit offensive. He does live in a small community in PA, not NYC, but I fail to see what difference that makes (if anything, I'd say it works in his favor). His profession is cabinet maker and furniture builder, a trade he followed long before his audio hobby brought him to begin speaker modifications. Every comment I've read on his woodworking, by both those who applaud his mods and those who are less appreciative, praise his craftsmanship level skill.

Regarding crossovers, the one PG builds is based on an earlier Magnepan design, not one of his own. Yes he does upgrade all the parts quality but that is a common modification, including those who choose to maintain the current crossover design. Reports by anyone who has upgraded parts identify far more than "slightly" improved performance.

And yes, there is skepticism regarding the increased efficiency. But many owners have reported increased loudness levels, regardless if that was quantified by measurements.

Saygrr, I agree regarding searching the Planar Asylum and might add the Planar Circle.

Did my 1.6's. Peter is a great guy, also very honest. The mods improve the Maggies, no question. Peter is a straight shooter so he makes a few enemies. My dealings with him were excellent. The speaker becomes smoother and more transparent. The cosmetics are a very subjective thing.

I've been to Pete's place and heard both the gunned 1.6 and SMGA and both were excellent. They definitely perform way above their price point. Jusy my 2 cents

I had Peter rebuild my 1.6's a couple of years ago (gosh has it been that long) anyway I think my speakers are the best. Are they perfect..no. But they are so much better than the original 1.6's it's just amazing. I could go on and on about clarity, soundstage and tonality but it really will not help you ...you just have to pull the trigger and have him do the work. I use to communicate with 'Peter" from time to time and I think he is avery ethical and great old word craftsman. I recently auditioned a new pair of 3.7's and you know what... they were really not that much better than my 1.6's that had been modded. Yes I have good ears and my girlfriend also said, Hey don't get the 3.7's ..there not that much better. HOWEVER we both agreed that the 20.1 maggies were much better in comparison to the 1.6's. Hope this helps.
Best wishes
charlie

I had Peter rebuild my 1.6's a couple of years ago (gosh has it been that long) anyway I think my speakers are the best. Are they perfect..no. But they are so much better than the original 1.6's it's just amazing. I could go on and on about clarity, soundstage and tonality but it really will not help you ...you just have to pull the trigger and have him do the work. I use to communicate with 'Peter" from time to time and I think he is avery ethical and great old word craftsman. I recently auditioned a new pair of 3.7's and you know what... they were really not that much better than my 1.6's that had been modded. Yes I have good ears and my girlfriend also said, "hey don't get the 3.7's ..there not that much better. HOWEVER we both agreed that the 20.1 maggies were much better in comparison to the 1.6's. Hope this helps.
Best wishes
charlie

I had Peter rebuild my 1.6's a couple of years ago (gosh has it been that long) anyway I think my speakers are the best. Are they perfect..no. But they are so much better than the original 1.6's it's just amazing. I could go on and on about clarity, soundstage and tonality but it really will not help you ...you just have to pull the trigger and have him do the work. I use to communicate with 'Peter" from time to time and I think he is avery ethical and great old word craftsman. I recently auditioned a new pair of 3.7's and you no what they were really not that much better than my 1.6's that had been modded. Yes I have good ears and my girlfriend also said, Hey don't get the 3.7's ..there not that much better. HOWEVER we both agreed that the 20.1 maggies were much better in comparison to the 1.6's. Hope this helps.
Best wishes
charlie

Whom ever that says the Magnestand is not much better then stock Maggie's
Either has not heard them or has an agenda.his hardwood frames are Night and Day better then the cheap mdf they come with as well as the
Total rewiring quality Vampire connectors and Superb capacitorsI have used the Mundorf Silver oil, as well as the Jupiter flat stack both excellent
And the Jantzen copper foil inductors and Duelund resistors are Miles better this is why they re seperate from the original enclosure these speakers are well worth all the time and monies that go into these
I heard the modified 1.6, and 3.6 these speakers compete very well with speakers several times their cost.just research .how many do you ever see up for sale? That is my point.you be the judge, no one else.

I heard both the 1.6's and the SMGA's at Pete's place about 5-6 years ago and would have bought a pair on the spot if I had the money. I actually prefered the SMGA's to the 1.6's excellent speakers for sure that easily compete with speakers costing much more