2. digital
  3. 149364-10060

Low cost WiFi streamer : Google Chromcast Audio v/s Audioengine B1

I have been using Google Chromcast Audio ( $35-40) for past  few months, using optical cable to take digital signal out  and  input into my external DAC ( Bryston BDA-1) , then Analog signal to Preamp and Amp and to my floor standing speakers. 
I am thinking to buy  Audioengine B1 ( $189)  and replace it in place of Chromcast Audio :
  https://hometheaterhifi.com/reviews/receiver-processor/receivers/audioengine-b1-bluetooth-music-receiver-review/
My question is : Will I get any improvement in sound quality ( comapred to Chromcast Audio ) ? Or any other benifits I get ?
I am tempted to buy it but  before that I want some feedback and suggestions from FMs here.
Thanks

radni
kalali's avatar
kalali
1,977 posts
 
According to the specs, its a Bluetooth device not a WiFi streamer. But that aside, my guess is it'll sound just about the same as CC Audio (using an external DAC) depending on your home WiFi performance. 
radni OP
96 posts
 
Thanks kalali.
Yes , I should have said "Bluetooth streamer" . WiFi speed , quality , reliability are good at my home. No issue there. 
If same quality sound using external DAC , I will forget about buying Audioengine B1 , and just continue to stay with my CC Audio.
Thanks for your views . 
toneranger58
124 posts
 
I have used the B1 for years and it works great and sounds very good. I stream from my IPad to the B1 to Yggdrasil to Sim 700i. I also use a basic optical cable, the B1’s own dac is pretty good, but nothing like the Yggy. My audiophile friends are surprised how well the B1 passes on data to the Yggy. I have not used Chromecast Audio.
More to discover