Loricraft and Keith Monks


I am soliciting your experience with these record cleaners..same principles except for the automatic thread feeder in the Keith..
is this a critical feature and what else separate the 2 other than one is pricier than the other..
i have collected a significant newly released lps and wanting to get the best record cleaner ..
ditto
Another option is the Odyssey RCM marketed by Auturo at Axiss Audio. below are links to view the one in my system:

http://cgim.audiogon.com/i/vs/i/f/1184570880.jpg

http://cgim.audiogon.com/i/vs/i/f/1184571050.jpg

It's superior to the Loricraft according to Lloyd Walker who owned and tested both. The Odyssey was certainly an improvement over my VPI 17F, which itself was a terrific LP cleaning machine.

Both the Loricraft and Odyssey (and I assume the Monks) are a blessing to clean records with, noise level is a fraction of that generated by VPI.
I had one of the first Keith Monks and sold it as too finicky. For years I had Nitty Gritty and then VPI cleaners, but then bought a Loricraft. It made my already cleaned LPs sound even cleaner.
If you want the best, it is my opinion that you want the Monks... I have never USED one- but, the Loricraft is the same concept. The difference being that Monks offers a "one touch" experience, from what I understand. I however did not have the cash flow to dump 5k (approx) into a Monks, so I thought I would save 3k and but the Loricraft PRC-3. I assume that the Loricraft and Monks take more time per LP to clean than say a VPI machine. With the Loricraft you have to apply the fluid, and do the dust removal yourself.. I prefer this method though, as it gives me some time to chill and drink a beer while I clean my vinyl... it also allows me to have control over the fluid application, etc.

So, to make this shorter- I think if you have a record business or tons of income.. Monks is the way to go. Other than that... it is hard to pay 3k extra for that minor added convenience.

Will