LONDON Decca, Tzar DST and similar cartridges


I have always been curious about these phono cartridges and the Stereophile review of the Tzar DST has heightened my interest. When I read about the peculiarities of these cartridges, I am put off from trying them. Can anyone offer persuasive reasons to try them and also provide real practical advice on how to make them work reliably?  Tonearm suggestions? Phono preamp suggestions? Damping recommendations? How badly do they grind out record grooves?  Any other words of advice? Thanks. 
128x128kmccarty

Showing 14 responses by noromance

Never heard anything like that. It sounds like the armature could be loose or damaged or the tie-back cord is not doing its job. 
Yeah, it's just that tinny, microphonic Decca sound when the stylus hits the groove. If you are gentle, it can be minimized.
Nice system, Howard. I'm at the low end of all this wonderful gear. (See my system in my profile)
I've had a Decca Super Gold since the 80s on an LP12 where it was eventually relegated to the bottom of the drawer.
It's since been rejuvenated with a Decapod and the same stylus as used in the LDR, and vanquished of malady by installing it on a slate plinthed and heavily modded Garrard 401. I've also acquired two other treasured Garrott Brothers' cartridges.
Ugh. The loading debate. Free the beast. To hell with the frequency hump. I use 51k bulk foil resistors and my Deccas never sounded better. 
@halcro Of course, I meant carbon fibre not graphite. I returned the Yamamoto CF headshell so I can’t experiment further. The bass was better delineated but the upper mids, highs and air were attenuated. That's a no-no for me. If I get a tax rebate, I may try the Arche. It is expensive but it has sterling feedback.
@halcro Sounds great. Very clear. Nice recording. Curious. You wrote a few years ago advising against graphite headshells. What changed your mind? 
@howardalex While not the LDR, I track all my Deccas at 1.65 grams. Speeds it up and lights it up. No AS on 12" arm.
@howardalex Thank you. I had a Radford ST50 long time ago with MO KT88s. Sweet and powerful with 3D imaging. But the big caps dried out and I let it go. My modified EICOs stun me every day with their control, detail, color and lifelike sound on the ESLs.
@bydlo Good read. Congrats. I tweak VTA by ear and lock it in when it sounds best - and I usually end up with the arm higher at the back. It will snap into focus within a small range so don't be afraid to experiment. My records must be clean because I do not get much fluff on the stylus. I drop and lift a few times into a Mr. Muscle pad every side. Pays dividends in diamond life.
Yeah, the low ride can pick up fluff but I find that the stylus picks up a lot less than cantilever-based cartridges.
Agreed on the soft brush -you don’t want to damage the tieback cord or worse. No idea about the AT637 but can't imagine there'd be an issue. I sent a well-used 6 year old SG to JW for work and he told me the stylus was not worn. This is a testament to the Magic Eraser and clean records.
I find the loading setting to sound best for my Deccas at 47k.* Lower values, while recommended, took some life away. It could be argued that I am not damping a resonance in the presence region but...
*I experimented and found that using 51k Vishay Z-foil resistors brings greater clarity, air, blackness and enhanced the color of vocals and instruments. You might also try 100k and 1Meg as I have heard it sounds good there too.
@bydlo re the Ti screws being lighter, the small sound difference could be caused by moving the counterweight closer to the pillar.