Life after Rotel RX 1052


I've had a Rotel RX-1052 receiver as my main amplifier for music for 10 years, driving entry-to-mid range (mostly B&W) speakers. 
Needless to say it has satisfied me for a long time, enough so that I never felt the need to replace it with a true integrated, or a pure stereo amp.
I'm looking for a stereo amp recommendation on what my next step up should be. I don't have a ton to spend (1500 - 2000 USD), but I'm willing to spend money on something that will be a clear upgrade in fidelity.
Some considerations:
- Music choice is varied. Quite a bit of electronic / electronic-infused music, balanced by jazz / funk. Some heavy rock.
- I have a second setup that is decidedly not modern, with a selection of 70's Technics, and Nikko amps driving Rectilinear Research III High Boys - I tend to listen to most acoustic music with vocals on that setup.
- I'll be soon using the amp with Sonus Faber Venere 2.5s.
- Maybe keeping the RX 1052 as my pre-amp could be an option?
- Source is split evenly between vinyl and digital streaming.

Expand my horizons!

128x128absolutlahmi

Showing 1 response by mcreyn

I used that receiver for about a year with a set of NHT SB3s. It worked well, but imho, was nothing special. I think it will be easy to improve on. I would not use the 1052 as a pre-amp. Either put it in your second system or sell it.

I am going to sound like a broken record. $299 for a closeout Schiit Saga or the new Schiit Saga + and $699 for a Schiit Vidar Amp. For $1,000, you will have a very nice sounding combo that comes with a 5 year warranty and you will have a hard, if not impossible time, beating for the same price used. Take the $1000 extra and use it on room treatments or put it in the bank.

In looking used, personally I would target newer Parasound equipment. Nice sounding, ability to drive moderately hard loads, and a good value. I say newer, because amps do age, and as their capacitors age, they change in sound. The only question is how much and how long it takes.