Lamm ML2 Vs Tenor 75

Heard both the Tenor/3.2 and Lamm ML2/3.2 as well as the the ML2's on the Kharma Exquisites. The ML2's are by far the best of the Lamm amps, and by a wide margin. I owned the Tenor/3.2 combo, which I preferred to the ML2/3.2 combo. Both are very good, the differences I heard as follows:
Tenors are more dynamic, extended in the highs, transparent and open and have a more realistic bass. Better attack of notes, and a "you area there" sense. I found the soundstage, width and particularly depth more reasistic with the Tenors. Overall I found the Tenors more lifelike, to the extent that the Lamms sound somewhat polite and anemic by comparison.

Translation:
Romy is not only ultimate, but seriously intimate.

You're far to obtuse to choose Lamm.

All speakers pale in comparison to Avantgarde.

This forum has a musical section, the content of which is musically infantile and not worthy of erudite Russion interest. It is laughable.

By your mere inquiry on this feeble site, you're doomed to make make untintelligent decisions because, well, you're unintelligent.

Due to above, Romy farts in your (our) general direction, and feels much better about himself.

meow