2. amps-preamps
  3. 1254670485

Lamm ML2, VLadimirs best effort to date?

Rumour has it VLadimirs early ML2 monos are his best design effort to date over the ML2.1
Near the time of the ML2s release onto the market, VLad commented ,nothing else could possibly be done to improve upon my amplifier design.

The intention of my post here is not wanting to start a fire storm based on information that I came across including that of an owner of the ML2.

Simply put I'm going down a completely new path for a system based around s.e.t. amplifiers, Lamm is my choice.

My question, any other owners here of the Lamm ML2 have direct comparison experience between the ML2 and ML2.1?
stiltskin

Showing 3 responses by stiltskin

stiltskin OP
499 posts
 
A smart reply Mechans [grin]
stiltskin OP
499 posts
 
Steve I'm sure Vlads statement ML3 is everything owners say it is and more, I'm happy for you.
stiltskin OP
499 posts
 
Thank you for your replies, the binding post issue brought up by Rhyno and Syntax coincides with that of the opinion of two other owners that I know.

However one insists the M2 is the better sounding design, I have not heard the M2 in a system.

Jtinn thanks for joining in, the M2.1 was a direct replacement for the M2 with a few changes including new boards that were not available at the time the M2 was developed.
Along with modified output transformers, compatible world wide electrical adjust ability and [ heavy duty speaker binding posts ]....The worm in the apple.

Finally , I admit I was a bit hasty with my title and rightly deserved the light ridicule up top, just excited at the prospects of a totally new system.
More to discover