I have had both the Ml1 and ML1.1 and as far as sound they both sounded about the same. The ML1 did sound a bit better overall but is was broken in more when I had them side by side. Both are amazing amps and just about the best I've heard. I use Bananas so the binding post are not a huge deal to me. WBT would be very cool and add a bit of improvement. For the money I have no problem removing a few screws if I had too over the ML1.1. I still have never had to replace a fuse knock on wood.
Lamm ML2, VLadimirs best effort to date?
Rumour has it VLadimirs early ML2 monos are his best design effort to date over the ML2.1
Near the time of the ML2s release onto the market, VLad commented ,nothing else could possibly be done to improve upon my amplifier design.
The intention of my post here is not wanting to start a fire storm based on information that I came across including that of an owner of the ML2.
Simply put I'm going down a completely new path for a system based around s.e.t. amplifiers, Lamm is my choice.
My question, any other owners here of the Lamm ML2 have direct comparison experience between the ML2 and ML2.1?
Near the time of the ML2s release onto the market, VLad commented ,nothing else could possibly be done to improve upon my amplifier design.
The intention of my post here is not wanting to start a fire storm based on information that I came across including that of an owner of the ML2.
Simply put I'm going down a completely new path for a system based around s.e.t. amplifiers, Lamm is my choice.
My question, any other owners here of the Lamm ML2 have direct comparison experience between the ML2 and ML2.1?