The Lamm ML 2.1 uses the russian tube, the 6C33. This has been popular with bat and joule electra and others. I think the tube has a dark sonic signature. The PX 25 sound is warmer and less mechanical with more spacious sound. You might also consider the deHavilland iso, either the 845 or the gm-70 tube. I am a dealer for them but don't let that keep you from looking at their website and reading all the juicy reviews. Good luck. By the way the gm-70 that deHavilland sells for 10K for a pair is the same tube that lamm uses on their ml3 and sells for 136K. Pretty high praise for that tube.
lamm ml 2.1 amplifier art audio px25 amplifier
lamm ml 2.1 amplifier art audio px25 amplifier
I would be happy if someone has previous experiences with art audio px 25 se amplifier and lamm ml 2.1 se (18 watts)
-what is the main differences between these two at musical and dinamic level ? ( not considering potency degree)
-at the level of timbres and performancwe on the midrange ?
THANKS you for your cooperation