IMHO, the differences are subtle. The Ceramique 2.0 benifited by a firm support surface, in my particular instance a plinth. Jim.
4 responses Add your response
The current crop, especially the 3.2F, are definately worth the money and I highly recommend them.
I started with Ceramique 2.0, went to 1.1s and now have the amazing Grand Midis.
But if you can get an older generation for a great price you are still getting one of the best speakers out there.
The Kharmas have evolved but not really changed, the
elements that attracted me to them in the beginning are still there just more refined which I assume will be an ongoing process.