Is there any advantage to lower efficiency speakers? 87 or below?

I forgot, unsound is right. :)

Very high sensitivity speakers (100dB+) often need very quiet amps to prevent the idle amp noise from becoming noticeable.

However I don't know if a single speaker designer who says "Oh, I'm going to hear too much noise, better lower the sensitivity...." :) That's not usually a concern.

Best,

E

@audioconnection I make loudspeakers.

I don't think it's an unfair question to ask why some speakers tend to have low efficiency, or how equipment may make some trade offs.

I also don't think efficiency is necessarily a quality standard. You should use your own tastes for that.

Best,


E

Hi Puff,

It’s not really desirable, but a speaker designer may end up getting there in order to get enough bass. It’s a little complicated to explain in text, but we can often sacrifice sensitivity for the sake of bass extension. Another way to look at it is not sacrificing but balancing one vs. the other.

This is how Magico’s S1 Mk II behaves, with an 83 dB sensitivity they manage to push out around 50-60 Hz as a lower cut-off.

http://www.soundstagenetwork.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1564:nrc-measu...

While I am not a particular fan of this speaker’s tonal balance, and overall cost of ownership, the overall idea is sound, meaning it’s not a cheat so much as run of the mill speaker design choice.

In my own 2-way speaker with a 6.5" driver I have to sacrifice 6 dB of sensitivity in order to get flat down to the 30-40Hz range, but I end up a little better, around 87 dB sensitivity overall. This is quite typical for speakers designed to be away from room boundaries.  I could have sacrificed even more to get more of a bass rise/bump in the lower end, but for my listening I chose not to.

Best,

E