Is going from a Ortofon Candenza Black to a Ortofon Winfield a lateral move?


I have an opportunity to pick up a very low use Winfield at a good price. That said, after moving my Cadenza Black I'll pay at least $750 for the Winfield. The Winfield retails for about $1,400 more but to me the specs look pretty similar. Anybody have any experience with these carts to provide some feedback? Thanks. 
Ag insider logo xs@2xbfoura

Showing 4 responses by billstevenson

I own both a Cadenza Black and a Windfeld (the original).  There is no comparison.  The Windfeld is a significantly superior transducer.  This is a good example of why reading specifications is not enough.  We need our ears.  The Windfeld is a top level cartridge regardless of price.
Actually both:  Phono preamp is a Conrad Johnson TEA 1 series III, which has a built in SUT.  Stand alone SUTs include a Bob's Devices Sky 10 very warm (nice), and a Consolidated Audio Silver, which is phenomenal.
Very interesting.  I just looked at my PW, which is the older version, under my Wild Heerbrugg microscope to confirm that it has a Replicant or line contact type stylus.  I compared it with both my 2M Black and Cadenza Black, to verify that they have Shibata stylii.  Just wanted to calibrate my eyeballs and make sure that I was looking at a non-Shibata geometric shape.  So I am not quite sure what to make of Michelle's PW with a Shibata stylus.  Maybe there was a running change somewhere along the line?  I don't know.  I did buy mine directly from Ortofon.  For the record it should also be stated that Ortofon is consistent throughout their line.  There has always been a natural and consistent progress in terms of sound quality as you move up through the line, as well as very consistent performance unit to unit. They have always displayed excellent quality control in my experience going back to my college days when I worked in HiFi retail for most of the 1970s. I can state that both my Cadenza Black and Windfeld are very neutral cartridges.  The difference between them, and it is quite noticeable to me, is that the latter has greater clarity, depth, and a more detailed presentation.  To answer other questions in this thread, I listen to mostly jazz and some classical, but really think that any genre, at least for modern recordings, would reveal these differences.
Bill 
bfoura   "the replicant stylus significantly more difficult to dial in compared to shibatas?"
Personally I find the shibata the most difficult to optimally set up of all types.  The Replicant is not too bad actually.