Its a matter of personal preference and budget. There are a number of outstanding Integrated Amps Plinius, Jeff Rowland, ML, Musical Fidelity, BAT and the list can go on and on...therefore going with Integrated is NOT a downgrade in anyway. In fact I was blown away when I moved from an MF A3 Pre/power to the Jeff Rowland Concentra II and couldn't be happier.
Integrated amp instead of pre+power ? Good idea?
Does anybody of you, to get the best sound synergy out of the budget and avoiding 2 chassis costs, obtained an improvement going from a pre+power combo to a integrated amp ?
I have a Goldmund mimesis 7.5 + Goldmund SRA amp (that tiny one with the job circuit).
Will it be a good idea to look to an integrated amps instead of taking the risk of changing one of the Goldmund loosing a combo sinergy ?
Thank you
PS.: As somebody suggested me, better to publish my system:
CD : CEC Tl 51 MK 2
Pre Goldmund Mimesis 7.5
power 50+50 W Goldmund SRA (do not need more power)
Speakers: Burmester Rondo 995
I have a Goldmund mimesis 7.5 + Goldmund SRA amp (that tiny one with the job circuit).
Will it be a good idea to look to an integrated amps instead of taking the risk of changing one of the Goldmund loosing a combo sinergy ?
Thank you
PS.: As somebody suggested me, better to publish my system:
CD : CEC Tl 51 MK 2
Pre Goldmund Mimesis 7.5
power 50+50 W Goldmund SRA (do not need more power)
Speakers: Burmester Rondo 995