In Search of Beatles Rock but not Pop


At least in part inspired by recent posts, I have been listening to more Beatles music and trying to learn more, but so far I seem to respect them more than I have grown to love them.

At the risk of being flamed by our Beatles fans, am I the only one who thinks that some of their music veers disappointingly in the direction of sappy, bubblegummy pop music?

I find when I listen, I want them to play louder, go darker, take more drugs, "shag" more girls, and wear their hair longer. I am the Walrus? I love it!! Blackbird? Superb. Come together? Terrific.

Maxwells Silver Hammer?? Silly. Octopus's Garden? No thank you. I want to hold your hand? Cute, but really just doesn't do it for me and I certainly don't want to listen over and over.

Can any Beatles gurus help me better understand their music and the evolution of their work? Could this be as simple as a Lennon vs McCartney preference? Maybe all of their music is much more complex and multi layered than I realise and I just need to spend more time with it. Or maybe I am trying to take the Beatles too seriously?

Is there something I just don't get here? Do any Beatles songs/albums really rock?

Thank you for your opinions.
cwlondon

Showing 3 responses by ben_campbell

CW-I think you need to put what The Beatles did in context.
However the big problem listening back to any music is that this can be difficult,consider that the music we are discussing is 30-40 years old!
But I do agree with your points,The Beatles at their worst were pretty ropey.
The big thing about The Beatles is actually their impact in a cultural sense,what happened tied in perfectly with the dawning of a so-called new era,it is an era and effect that popular music will be unlikely to see repeated.
Their standing as the most important popular music group is unchallenged because of the many levels they achieved success on,as a Dylan fan I could argue he was in fact a greater talent but I couldn't argue his impact in a popular sense was anywhere near as great.
Their genius to me is the progression that they made in a short period of time,the journey from Please Please Me to Strawberry Fields is quite a long one,they absorbed quite avant garde idea's and presented them in (mostly)a very palatable way without diluting the power of the message and well they just wrote outstanding melodic songs.
Also I guess they disbanded before they managed to decline artistically as inevitably happens to all groups.
As for the rock aspect,I remember being amazed seeing them perform Revolution live on TV(part of some TV special at the time) and how hard and how great a band they sounded since I'd missed them due to being too young I had thought of them as a pop band,they rocked believe me.
It's easy to forget they cut their teeth as a live act and that they were fantastic musicians,we tend to think of them as songwriters and of course they had retired from live work before the true rock era began.
I'm sure others have their own idea's to add but I would suggest you read Ian MacDonald's book A Revolution In The Head,it's a pretty serious work but puts their achievements in context,in terms of social and historical events as well as musical.
Cw-I suppose part of what I was trying to say is that in general the Beatles weren't a rock band.They could play heavy and they did ocassionaly but it was only a small aspect to what they did.
They were amongst the bands who pioneered the rock era but they were based more in 50's rock and roll,others followed and took the rock thing further................
Cw-you were born the same year as me,I can understand your comments totally,I didn't really seriously listen to the Beatles till about 6 years ago.......................