How to read speaker sensitivity rating?


.
When reading the sensitivity rating on speaker specs, does a lower number mean the speaker is easier to drive than a speaker with a higher number? Such as a speaker rated 78 db would be easier to drive than a speaker rated 102 db?
.
128x128mitch4t

Showing 5 responses by mitch4t

.
Okay, assuming the nominal impedance for both speakers is 4 ohms. Does that mean the one rated at 78 db will play louder than the one rated at 102 db at the same power?

I've seen a few discussions here about the difficulty of some speakers to be driven and I often see sensitivity numbers thrown around.
.
.
Jdoris, an auditon trip to Utah is certainly under consideration. There are several speakers that I am considering. All of them require a plane ticket for me to audition them at their location. The freight to get them to me in Los Angeles will be ungodly. That's why I'm asking so many questions on this forum....to eliminate any unnecessary travel. Of course SOME travel will be required. I'd like to narrow it down to two finalists. I am also considering a set of Genesis 201 speakers, VMPS V60/VLA combo, Magnepan 201 with a separate subwoofer.
.
.
Z-man,
Not pulling your leg here. the reason that I'm asking is
that I own several pairs of Infinity Kappa 9 speakers. They
are notorious amp-killers. I read the specs on them and it
says 102 db. Well the logic seems that if everyone knows
that those things are impossible to drive, the higher number
must mean harder to drive speakers. I am considering
purchasing a pair of Zu Dominance speakers. The sensitivity
rating is 101. I read an article about them being driven at
CES by a twenty watt tube amp. Well if the sensitivity
rating is only 1 db off of the rating of the Kappa 9,
something doesn't add up. Viridan noted that the impedance
would make a difference. The Zu speakers are 6 ohm and the
Kappa 9 are 4 ohm. I've always known that the lower the
nominal impedance of a speaker would make it harder to
drive, I just never understood the sensitivity thing.

Also, if you look at any of my previous posts, never have I
had a discussion of speaker sensitivity. I'm very sincere
about my lack of knowledge in this area. I posed the
question here because I do not want to make a $40k error out
of ignorance. The Zu Dominance speaker is a custom order
and there are no dealers that stock them so that I can
audition them. I'm trying to gather as much info as I can
in order to make an informed decision before I commit. So,
it's pretty much as I've always thought, lower impedance
ratings pretty much will determine the amount of muscle that
you would need to drive the speaker. In some threads around
here, it seemed that sensitivity ratings were thrown around
quite a bit as a big factor in the difficulty in driving a
speaker.

I'd like to try tube amps, and I know that the high powered
tube amps cost an arm and a leg, and I only have an arm....a
small arm. So it's important for me to make sure I get a
speaker that will play loud with serious bass when powered
by a tube amp. If you've checked the room size my system is
in, you'll see that the speaker will need to be able to
deliver some serious spl's.

Also, I checked my history of posting here and have seen
with a lot of consistency, that I've always posted a barrage
of questions prior to purchasing an item. With every
addition to my system, I find that I have posted lots of
questions on this forum about that item. Amazingly, every
time I don't post a question and I buy something, the
purchase turns out to be a clunker.

I'm more of a music lover than an audiophile. I've never
rolled a tube in my life. I don't know how to use a
soldering iron and I wouldn't dream of attempting DIY
project. By being here 10 years and asking lots of
questions, I've gained quite a bit of knowledge about audio.
But, also every week I read something here that reminds me
of how much I don't know.
.
.
Bug,

Yes, those are the exact specs that I used, which is why this
whole thread started. I bi-amp my Kappa 9's with four 900
wpc @ 4 ohm monoblocs. I did not understand what those specs
meant, but I do know that they looked very similar to the
specs that I read on the Zu Dominance. It was mentioned that
the Zu Dominance was being driven with authority by a 20 watt
tube amp. The Kappa 9 would vaporize a 20 watt tube amp.
The Kappa 9 specs posted on the web are what I've been using
as a comparison chart when considering other speakers. So,
all I've needed to know all along was that those Kappa 9
specs posted on the web are wrong.
.
.
Hifihvn...you are right on both counts. The Harmon site has the model number correct, but the parts are for the Kappa 9.1, not the original Kappa 9. The Kappa 9 does not have an 8 inch mid-bass driver...it has a Polygraph and a Polydome drivers that do not appear on the parts sheet on the Harmon site. The Kappa 9.1 was a ported design that was much easier to drive than the original Kappa 9. The bass drivers were different also.
.