How a turntable is like a gym membership


.
I was a member of the YMCA for years. I was there every night five days a week working out and playing basketball. I got married and started having children, but I kept my membership, I just wasn't using it. I wouldn't drop my membership because I liked playing basketball so much, I just wasn't going to the gym. Once a year, I'd go to the gym to justify my keeping it. I had to go to the front desk to get the combination to my locker, I had been there so seldom, I forgot the combination. After about five years reality set in and I finally dropped the membership. So I bought a full-fledged home gym that I now don't use, I go walking with my iPod instead.

I own two turntables, a record-cleaning machine and over 3,000 jazz LP's. Over the last five years I may have played a total of three or four LP's. I bought both of my turntables because they are both beautiful and thought that it would force me to play my vinyl. Wrong! I have an excellent CD player and I also own a SqueezeBox. Sorry, but digital is just too doggone convenient. It was nice owning two beautiful turntables so my guests could oooh and ahhh when thay saw them. It was cool to say "yeah, I still spin vinyl" when the fellas saw my system. But the truth was, I rarely came near the turntables. They served as not much more than Audio Sculpture or Audio Eye-Candy. Both of them sound beautiful, but I'll be doggone if I'm willing to go through ritual of cleaning the LP, cueing it, and be standing nearby to remove the arm when the last song is finished on one side. I kind of always felt that there was an unwritten rule somewhere that to be considered a "true audiophile" that you had to have analog playback included in your system. Sorry, but I've given in to 21st Century technology and I'm moving on. There, I've said it, I've been faking it as an analog lover for the past few years. Well, I do actually love analog, I just don't have time for it.

So, I put on an album tonight and DAMN that vinyl sounded good! But, after about 30 minutes, I realized that I have been spoiled by the convenience of digital and I'm just not willing to go through the gyrations to play an LP any longer.

So, the turntables have to go, but I'm keeping my LP's just in case. Hopefully my 13 year-old son will take them when he graduates from college.
.
128x128mitch4t

Showing 6 responses by phaelon

I've stopped going to a pal's house to listen with him because of his newly rediscovered passion for vinyl. Whereas before we would both be flipping through his extensive CD collection and having a ball, now the ritual associated with choosing an LP to play on his very expensive analog setup is daunting. One can only choose LP's that have been recently deep cleaned, and even then, it takes 5-10 minutes of preparation and tweaking to actually play a side. No thanks, I'll stick with CD's and as soon as I am confident that Hi-Rez downloads are the way to go - Whee!
It's not the flipping of sides or lifting of tonearms that bothers me about analog, it's the setup and tweaking and never being sure that you're at anywhere near your turntable assembly's potential. I realize that proper set-up, component matching and tweaking are a fact of life in audio, but their importance seems to be over-the-top in analog. You believe that you have expert set-up, and then one day someone suggests you use half a drop less of lubricant in some reservoir and bang, there it is. I think what bothers me the most is seeing just how much my analog friends suffer with their setups. One day they're ecstatic; the next day, they just don't know what's wrong. And it seems like it's always just after making a big ticket upgrade, that they find out that some small adjustment wasn't right. I'm not suggesting that digital is a better choice because of this, but I do think that analog, at least through a turntable, requires a long run commitment to the hardware aspect of audio. I don't know if analog devotees ever reach the point where they can ignore their system for a year or two and just hit play.
Koegz, I'm sure you don't really mean to say that anyone who doesn't enjoy the extra tweaking involved in vinyl, doesn't possess the requisite passion for music to appreciate it at a level beyond background music. To call a person who said, and meant, that "arrogant" would be kind.
Actually, given the enthusiasm for analog, I'm surprised that reel-reel hasn't found it's way back. I know about the tape project, but that doesn't seem very reasonable to me. I've never heard a top flight tape source but people I have respect for say it's incomparable. If it's profitable to make all these special vinyl pressings from master tapes, why not tapes?
That's the opinion I hear from every corner Mapman. Given the amount of money audiophiles have shown they're willing to spend to wring the least iota of nuance from their systems, why is this format being so neglected?
Tvad, of the reasons you stated, the limited lifespan of tape makes the most sense to me. That's a hard one to get around.