Hi Bob,
I agree with the preceding responses, and I think that the increased sample rates of hi rez are much more significant than the increased number of bits per sample.
It is probably tempting to think of a 96kHz sample rate as little more than a doubling of the 44.1kHz redbook standard, while an 8-bit increase in the resolution of each sample represents a 256-fold improvement.
But I think that the sample rate increase is best viewed in relation to the Nyquist frequency (the 40kHz minimum sampling frequency which is theoretically required to digitally represent a 20kHz bandwidth). Redbook's 44.1kHz exceeds the Nyquist rate by only about 10% (which is such a small margin that it has always seemed wondrous to me that it works as well as it does). But 96kHz exceeds the Nyquist rate by 140%, and 192kHz exceeds it by 380%. Assuming good implementation, those higher margins should make possible vastly reduced side effects from anti-aliasing and reconstruction filters, those effects having been generally recognized to have limited cd sound quality right from the start.
So my answer to your original question is no, I don't think the analog amp is a bottleneck.
Best regards,
-- Al
I agree with the preceding responses, and I think that the increased sample rates of hi rez are much more significant than the increased number of bits per sample.
It is probably tempting to think of a 96kHz sample rate as little more than a doubling of the 44.1kHz redbook standard, while an 8-bit increase in the resolution of each sample represents a 256-fold improvement.
But I think that the sample rate increase is best viewed in relation to the Nyquist frequency (the 40kHz minimum sampling frequency which is theoretically required to digitally represent a 20kHz bandwidth). Redbook's 44.1kHz exceeds the Nyquist rate by only about 10% (which is such a small margin that it has always seemed wondrous to me that it works as well as it does). But 96kHz exceeds the Nyquist rate by 140%, and 192kHz exceeds it by 380%. Assuming good implementation, those higher margins should make possible vastly reduced side effects from anti-aliasing and reconstruction filters, those effects having been generally recognized to have limited cd sound quality right from the start.
So my answer to your original question is no, I don't think the analog amp is a bottleneck.
Best regards,
-- Al