I own a 37 and 36 Levinson. The Digital Lens made a significant improvement. Not huge, but worth the $ on the current used market. I also have noticed a very substantial difference between cables (mind you I didn't say improvement, but difference). I've found the AQ falcon to perform the best for my tastes and the Cardas lightening second and the Orchid was a distant third--but I think it is very system dependent. As for the lens--well it's probably much better than just about any reclocking device and with Genesis out of business the price should be very right (or don't get it at all)
Genesis Time Lens improvement?
I wonder if any of you have any experiences with the
Genesis Time Lens? I've found an audible difference
in sound quality between not only between different
interfaces between the CD transport and D/A (i.e., AT&T,
coaxial) but also between different cables between
these interfaces. The transport and D/A I'm using are
both from Krell. I thought the reclocking and storage
the Genesis provides might improve things.
TIA
Genesis Time Lens? I've found an audible difference
in sound quality between not only between different
interfaces between the CD transport and D/A (i.e., AT&T,
coaxial) but also between different cables between
these interfaces. The transport and D/A I'm using are
both from Krell. I thought the reclocking and storage
the Genesis provides might improve things.
TIA